User talk:SweetieBelleMLP

Hi

Thanks for your interest in WP:MLP and documentation of all things pony! Princess Derpy (talk) 03:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you! Sorry it took me so long to get back about this lovely welcoming message :p SweetieBelleMLP (talk) 13:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pickbothmanlol for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Brandt

hi. it seems Daniel Brandt has it in for everypony. drop me a line, i wonder if he has been causing you the same difficulty he has been causing me. -badmachine 12:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image removal

I have removed an image from your user page which violates WP:Userpage. If you restore this image or replace it with a similar image, you will be immediately blocked from editing. Rklawton (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

- Rklawton (talk) 16:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rklawton (talk) 16:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ban

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SweetieBelleMLP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked by Rklawton for "Creating attack, nonsense or other inappropriate pages" after adding a free use image to my userpage in order to replace the removed artwork. In no way does this violate wp:userpage or any other policy. I was then reblocked as a "vandalism only account" when I have not once vandalized. User:SweetieBelleMLP 17:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Let's call it "trolling", then. From your edits it is clear that you're not here to edit constructively. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 17:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SweetieBelleMLP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You still have no solid reason for my block, other than IJUSTDONTLIKEIT.

By the way, PP4L was in a recent news article, my reason for making the redirect. User:SweetieBelleMLP 17:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edits to your userpage have amply demonstrated that you are not here to contribute constructively. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admins: the ANI thread unanimously supporting the indef block is here. Rklawton (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]