User talk:SweetSpicySour

Welcome!

Hello, SweetSpicySour, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to South African farm attacks. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 12:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

South African farm attacks

Please read WP:POV also you need to lean how to Identifying reliable sources. YouTube and right-wing websites are not reliable sources.--I am One of Many (talk) 16:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on your talkpage. SweetSpicySour (talk) 22:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. Since you had some involvement with the Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Doug Weller talk 06:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore this, withdrawn. Doug Weller talk 15:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Straw feminism

The merge request was invalid as the target article was never informed about it and no rationale for a merge was given. Doug Weller talk 08:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Legitimate sock account

I think you are stretching this by editing articles on feminism and your redirect. These can be seen as contentious subjects everywhere in the world. Doug Weller talk 08:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:SOCK#LEGIT, "A person editing an article which is highly controversial within his/her family, social or professional circle, and whose Wikipedia identity is known within that circle, or traceable to their real-world identity, may wish to use an alternative account to avoid real-world consequences from their editing or other Wikipedia actions in that area." Your insinuations of bad faith at RfD are not acceptable. SweetSpicySour (talk) 02:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]