User talk:Swe123123

Welcome!

Hello, Swe123123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Hojat Rahimi, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Nafisa Kamal. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. The nomination has been made. You can—and should—add your remarks to the AfD explaining why the page should remain. (Please cite Wikipedia policies and reliable sources as you do so.) However, you cannot abort the nomination by removing the tag from the article. In fact, you made a huge mess of the situation by doing so, as there are now two extra AfD pages that got created and will need to be cleaned up. —C.Fred (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nafisa Kamal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please leave the entire AfD boilerplate in place. The administrators who close the AfD will appreciate having the code available that's in the comment. —C.Fred (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An extended welcome

Hi Swe123123. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Naila Nayem, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EvergreenFir I'm sorry for my inconvenience for Disruptive editing. Actually I'm editing native name and this page name same that way i just clear it . If different languages name can added native name . I'm sorry for this page edit . Unblocked please. Swe123123 (talk) 20:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Inchi Inchi Prem, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before saving a change. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hojat Rahimi (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Hojat Rahimi instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hojat Rahimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hojat Rahimi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swe123123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:45, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faryad Radio (Iran) (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faryad Radio (Iran) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Faryad Radio (Iran), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

You can only vote once at AFD. You need to strike <s>~~the vote you don't want~~</s>. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But when I say "vote", don't get the idea it's a vote - Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion. Cabayi (talk) 13:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's been done for you. Cabayi (talk) 13:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

@C.Fred: @BrownHairedGirl: @Materialscientist: @Diannaa: @DeltaQuad: @Bbb23: @Ser Amantio di Nicolao: @Yunshui: Hi sir i do not know why I was suddenly blocked! I'm not related to any kind of paid Wikipedia. User:Ivanvector blocked me for TOU violation and probable meatpuppetry. But i am truly saying that i am not, I am not involved with any kind of violence and I have been blocked by mistake for no reason. I used to work in Wikipedia since 2014, I going to Sweden in 2015 and then I forgot my previous Wikipedia password since then, I did not do any work for the last 5 years. recently I’m started again edit Wikipedia. I have the idea of before how can edit the Wikipedia . Bangladesh is my homeland I have the citizen of Malaysia become my mon Malaysian and right now I live in the Sweden. I know famous Person people from these three countries and with them I will be able to create these articles . I know about the famous people of these three countries! Why was blame me that I work on paid for Wikipedia? I think the person who blocked me has no idea about this, that I have know those three countries categories of Celebrities and famous people. sir, I have told you everything open to me, hopefully you will help me. Swe123123 (talk) 5:231, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm curious. When was the last time you were in Bangladesh?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Yeah , I am in Bangladesh right now. I’m always use Wikipedia from one of my devices, my iPhone 6. Last night I logged my Wikipedia and Facebook into a cyber cafe, Dhaka Bangladesh. So in the morning I see that my account block.I'm back in Bangladesh for a while, I'll be back to Sweden soon. Thanks Swe123123 (talk) 8:16, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

@Ivanvector, there doesn't seem to have been a block notice here. Please can you explain a little more of why you blocked this editor? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reblocked you, this time a CU-block. Your account is very Likely to the following previous socks:
- AfghanRocks008 (talk · contribs · count)
- NleeNehal (talk · contribs · count)
- Afghan7171 (talk · contribs · count)
- PabelKhan1971 (talk · contribs · count)
- AzNahalofficial1995 (talk · contribs · count)
See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23:— I do not know who they are, I think there is a mistake somewhere. I do not know why I was suspected to be involved. When I created my account it is from Sweden! recenty I come to Bangladesh and buy a SIM so I do not know what kind of ip address problem here Last night I used my Facebook and Wikipedia in a cyber cafe. Please help me How can I get the solution from this problem. —Swe123123 (talk) 9:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Please unblock me 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swe123123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@C.Fred:@BrownHairedGirl:@Materialscientist:@Diannaa:@DeltaQuad:@Bbb23:@Ser Amantio di Nicolao: Hi sir i do not know why I was suddenly blocked! I'm not related to any kind of paid Wikipedia. User:Ivanvector blocked me for TOU violation and probable meatpuppetry. But i am truly saying that i am not, I am not involved with any kind of violence and I have been blocked by mistake for no reason. I used to work in Wikipedia since 2014, I going to Sweden in 2015 and then I forgot my previous Wikipedia password since then, I did not do any work for the last 5 years.recently I’m started again edit Wikipedia. I have the idea of before how can edit the Wikipedia . Bangladesh is my homeland I have the citizen of Malaysia become my mon Malaysian and right now I live in the Sweden. I know famous Person people from these three countries and with them I will be able to create these articles . I know about the famous people of these three countries! Why was blame me that I work on paid for Wikipedia? I think the person who blocked me has no idea about this, that I have know those three countries categories of Celebrities and famous people. sir, I have told you everything open to me, hopefully you will help me. Swe123123 (talk) 5:231, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A checkuser has confirmed a high likelihood that you were using sockpuppets. Before I could consider lifting the block, you would need to provide some extraordinarily persuasive evidence that the Checkuser was mistaken. That evidence has not been provided.
As noted below, please stop pinging admins. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your repeated pings of multiple admins and the repetition of your defense has become disruptive. Stop it. If you don't, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— im sorry for my inconvenience! I’m so much upset for why I’m face like this problem. please can you help unblock me ! can you suggest me what I am doing right now I’m respect to you ! i share my everything! please I’m request to you sir.

@BrownHairedGirl: —Sister this is my last request, I will not disturb anyone. can you explain me how can I prove that I’m not using sockpuppets There is no way to solve this problem. I repeat again I use Wikipedia on my particular phone . I only have one account. I browsed the Internet in a public cyber cafe yesterday, using Facebook and wikipedia there since then my account blocked! I think I have no guilt .if I have any mistake, forgive me Swe123123 (talk) 18:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swe123123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m not using sockpuppets There is no way to solve this problem. I repeat again I use Wikipedia on my particular phone . I only have one account. I browsed the Internet in a public cyber cafe yesterday, using Facebook and wikipedia there since then my account blocked! I think I have no guilt Swe123123 (talk) 23:16, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your best chance right now is to appeal to Arbcom. See Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban appeals. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've revoked Talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:21, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tasnova Hoque Elvin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tasnova Hoque Elvin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tarunno (talk) 09:16, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]