User talk:Swbyang
Speedy deletion of Performance of a Solar Array
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Performance of a Solar Array, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cricketgirl (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Performance Benchmark for an installed PV system, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —Caesura(t) 01:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- My advice would be to carefully review Wikipedia's policies and make sure the content you want to include is suited to this medium. In particular, you should make sure the content is factual, your point of view is neutral, the information is verifiable and well supported by existing sources, and the content does not constitute original research. Make sure you provide enough context for non-expert readers. Finally, take a close look at our guide to writing better articles. Moreover, remember to proofread your articles carefully before submitting them, and make sure they would make sense to the average reader. I hope this helps. Happy editing. —Caesura(t) 02:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Ah yes
[edit]Firstly, allow me to apologize for not having dealt with this earlier. I strongly recommend that you read the guidelines as to what Wikipedia is not; this should make things more clear. To summarize, though, your material may well be suitable for a different project, but it's not suitable for here.
If you'd like, I can provide you with that material. DS (talk) 04:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)