User talk:Swannieriv

Discretionary sanctions alerts - biographies of living people, gender and sexuality

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feelings of frustration

Hello! Roxy here.

I'm all too aware how discouraging and frustrating it can feel to have your changes reverted, and to see subjects you care deeply about aren't described the way you'd like them to be. All the same, remember to comment on content, not on the contributor, or their possible intentions. Though we each have our own experiences, we are all working very hard to create a useful, accurate, and neutral reference work.

As your account is quite new to the project (is this your first?), I might suggest taking a short break from the Gender/sexuality sphere, and improve some less hotly contested articles (there is a lot that can be done) to build up your skill in writing from the NPOV, and making policy-based arguments. With more practice under your belt, you should be able to make changes that really stick.

While there's always room for sweeping rewrites (so long as editors agree that the new content adheres to policies and guidelines), we can't just delete and rewrite articles like Genspect solely for the sake of incorporating less criticism (this would violate WP:DUEWEIGHT). If you scroll back into history, you'll find that some of Wikipedia's highest quality articles have extremely humble beginnings. The first version of Thomas Jefferson was only two sentences long. There's always room for improvement! Best wishes, and happy editing. RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (talk · contribs) 23:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]