User talk:Svolkenand

Welcome!

Hello, Svolkenand, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 13:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The course page is at Wikipedia:Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/Autumn 2016.

Feedback on your article

Hello Svolkenand, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

Intro sentence: Please check more existing Wikipedia articles, we make the subject in the first sentence bold. If there is an abbreviation, you do not need to mention "short:" as people would understand that an abbreviation is short. Is it really the case that user generated content only can be found online? I doubt it.
Links: almost sufficient, please link a few more keywords.
Headers: Why so long: "Forms of user-generated content"? I think just "Forms" would say exactly the same. I think "UGC as strategic marketing tool" can be shorter with just "Marketing tool".
References: "User-generated content can be seen as part of the Web 2.0 and participatory culture." -> please provide source (reference)! "All forms of fanart, fan fiction and contributions in online fan forums can also be considered as user-generated content." -> please provide source for this claim.
Other: Please add under the header "References" the following: {{Reflist}} For the rest I think it is a balanced article
Ready to publish: because your article is about user-generated content, and the article User-generated content already exists in Wikipedia, your article can't be published as we only have one article for a single subject. But I would recommend you to look for parts that can be copied from your article to the existing article. This I think you can to at the end of the coming session.

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 15:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Svolkenand, Thank you for making all the improvements!

Intro sentence: okay, but my earlier question remains.
Links: okay, besides one keyword that needs a link too: "Wikipedia" (paragraph 3).
Headers: Use less capitalised characters, usually we only make the first character of a header capitalised, unless it is a given name.
References: In the first paragraph, the last sentence needs a reference because it is a some kind of claim. For the rest I see sufficient references. I also see that some references are used more than once. Those should be merged to one, see for instructions on the project page. As example I changed reference number 3 already for you, see the difference here.

Greetings - Romaine (talk) 23:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Oh happy day LindaV123 (talk) 13:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	whatever... I dunno... Bananas :D Bettitea (talk) 13:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

What happened to that plan of having Bandtos' cookies for every tutorial? Alorspetiteanne (talk) 13:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]