User talk:Sviatoslav86

Welcome!

Hello, Sviatoslav86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 22:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3-revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on British National Party. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. —Psychonaut 02:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No getting nasty

No worries mate, there's no getting nasty about it - my problem is that it is an info box, which is a place for categorisation and description - the bulk of available literature seems to indicate taht the BNP can be reasonably be designated as a fascist organisation, the only contrary appears to be some weak arguments derived from some definitions of fascism (but not necessarilly others) and their denial. Now, I'd be really happy for a substantial sectionabout their denial of fascism to be in the article, and I think that that is better than a qualifer in the info box. However, I also want to end the edit warring, ebcause it seems the article needs more work elsewhere, so, if you restore the qualifier, I won't remove it, although, as said, I'd rather you put teh denial in the text of the article...--Red Deathy 07:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 12:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at British National Party. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Sam Blacketer 15:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Rod Langway

If you read the introduction of the article, List of NHL statistical leaders by country, you would notice that it says "by their country of birth, regardless of their citizenship, following Hockey Hall of Fame convention." So if one were to look at the relevent section here, which also states "players are categorized by birthplace based on current geographical regions, not citizenship," it lists Langway as the top scorer for Taiwan. Whether or not he was born on a US military base, which there is no source proving this, he was still born in Taiwan. That's why the HHOF lists him as being from Taiwan, and that's why he is included in the list on Taiwan on the article. If there are any further issues with the conventions of the article, add it to the relevent talk page, or at the ice hockey project talk page. Thank you. Kaiser matias 05:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed sock puppet of banned user

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Laderov (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

A Wikipedia administrator has now confirmed that User:Sviatoslav86 is a sock puppet account (and a disruptive POV-pusher), and has blocked the account from editing Wikipedia articles.Spylab 14:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]