User talk:Sverdrup

This user may have left Wikipedia. Sverdrup has not edited Wikipedia since December 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This is User:Sverdrup's talk page. Feel free to leave a message in English, German or Scandinavian
Sverdrup is a sysop. If you have any questions about Wikipedia or it's contents feel free to ask.

Talk archives:	1	2

Beyond Divbox

Replied to your comment on Template talk:Divbox#Content/Fact box. — Xiong 熊 talk * 2005 June 30 09:51 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Constellations

I see that you are listed as a contributor for this project. Because the project is incomplete, I would like to find out what the current plans are for the project. Much work is still needed, particularly for constellations in the southern sky. I believe we need to do the following:

Complete the infobox for each constellation.
Standardise the format for each constellation.

On my user page, I have posted a few ideas for standardisation and I would like some feedback. -- B.d.mills (T, C)

Rondane

Hallo Sverdrup, da ich hier Deutsch schreiben darf, werde ich das mal machen. Deutsch fällt mir doch wesentlich leichter als Englisch. Ich habe den Artikel de:Rondane gerade nach Deutsch übersetzt. Vielleicht magst Du ihn Dir ja mal anschauen. Weshalb ich Dir schreibe: Noch fehlen die Bilder. Magst Du vielleicht Deine Bilder auf die Wikimedia-Commons hochladen? Ich könnte es zwar auch, aber ich finde es besser, wenn ich mich da nicht mit fremden Federn schmücke. Daher wollte ich es Dir überlassen, auch auf Commons der Hochlader zu sein. Danke, --Elwe 13:31, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thankees!

Thank you so very much for your Wikipreview.html... That seems to be exactly what I'm looking for. :) You might want to tell Pilaf about it, I'm sure he'd find it useful... Almafeta 10:44, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome; it's really Pilaf's work all of it, the parser being the most important component. I've already told him about it. Please tell me about any problems/bugs there might be, though. It have not exactly tested it thoroughly. — Sverdrup 10:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the Announcement and Goings-on page

Thank you for responding to my request to change the Wikipedia:Announcements and Wikipedia:Goings-on pages (see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Announcements and Goings-on. But I would like your opinion about the steps needed to change the Goings-on page, its new design, and how to advertise it to the community. Thank you. CG 18:02, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Bilder

Denna bild sv:Bild:User-Sverdrup-2004-04.jpg saknar källa och licens. Märk den gärna, då bilder utan märkning kan den komma att raderas. Mvh Elinnea 11:48, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hej hej jag heter cooper gillan. jag är amerikansk, men jag har studerat svenska. jag skriver bara för att fråga dig om bilden på ikeas sida. var ligger butiken på bilden? det är en fint bild! jag var i jönköping i januari till maj. jag har en kompis som bor i kristianstad och jag har en skåne flag!! hoppas att allt är bra. hejdå. NPPyzixBlan 21:14, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

hej, tack för meddelandet. a, du tänkte rätt, bilden som du hade var bilden jag menade. jag frågade om den bara därför att jag tyckte att det var lite konstigt att se en ikea utan blå och gul, eller hur? jag har mycket ikea på min lägenhet, och det finns mycket ikea på mitt universitet. hej, tycker du om dungen? de är svensk och min kompis frågade mig en gång om jag kunde förstå texter, men....hehe, inte så mycket. jag försöker. jag har en amerikansk kompis som studerade på lunds universitet för tre år sedan, och hon älskade lund. men alla älskar sverige, eller hur?? tack och hejdå. NPPyzixBlan 23:27, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

Hej Sverdup Den fina rondanebilden på flakksfjellet, nu har jag försökt göra så att man kan se att det är jag som har tatt den, inte du, men jag fattar inte hur man gör. Inte för att det spelar någon roll eller så, rent licensmässigt är den din. Jag har abra fruktansvärt tråkigt och lång håltimme. // Sverdrup d.y

Jeje, jag har fixat det. On a related note, har jag 100Mbit anslutning nu XD. ❝Sverdrup❞ 14:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martian longitude

In your edit summary to Olympus Mons, you said, "226 E?? there are only 180 of those, so the link doesn't work. Fixed to 134 W, verified that the link works and displays olympus mons in the applet." On Mars, longitude ranges from 0° to 360°--eastward or westward, depending on your mood. For instance, see Image:MarsTopoMap-PIA02031 modest.jpg

"You can now view the coordinates for Mars in two different systems: planetographic latitude with longitude increasing to the west, or planetocentric latitude with longitude increasing to the east. Both systems are approved for use on Mars by the International Astronomical Union (Seidelmann and others 2002).

"Planetographic latitude with west longitude is the system that has traditionally been used for Mars, and was previously the only system used on this web site. Planetocentric latitude with east longitude has been adopted for use by the USGS and other organizations for use in making future Mars maps and imagery (Duxbury and others 2002)."

http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/TOCmarsmain.html

—wwoods 17:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification! Unfortunately the link didn't work (the link to the kvaleberg map sources) with 226° E, so we had to change it. I hope it's no big deal as both sets of coordinates describe the same spot, with different but accepted standards. — Sverdrup 11:02, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Libertyskyline.PNG has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Libertyskyline.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

re:Category:Wikipedians by D&D Alignment

I noticed you are categorized as a Wikipedian by alignment. If you are in to userboxes, there are now infoboxes available using a standard template. See the alignment category page for details. This is a copied announcement, please reply on My Talk Page or in the category talk if you have any questions. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 18:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:User-Sverdrup-2004-02.jpg

Hello -- your image (noted in the header) which is for community use only (see tag {{CommunityUseOnly}} are now being tagged as speedy delete, you might consider removing the image, or relicensing it. --Admrboltz (T | C) 17:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for your kind words! Absolutely; EVERYONE should share this moment. A millionth article is nothing without 999,999 behind it. Nach0king 09:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Montreal

Hallo fetter! Jeg har vært på Wikipedia en liten stund nå, men det tok meg en liten stund å finne ut hvor brukersiden din var. Tøft å se deg som admin. Vi sees i sommer! --Ludvig 21:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dams of Africa

Sorry about that ... LeRoi was right, some red categories ought to stay that way. -- ProveIt ^(talk) 15:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allright, I hear that. I don't have much to add then I guess :) I just wanted to make sure everybody could make new category schemes, regardless of what we already have (well not totally regardless perhaps). ❝Sverdrup❞ 15:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

are you

are you the one who made the in flames artical on this web site if so why do you think in flames is a nu romantic pop group

if so messgeage me back with you ansewer

Speedy deleted porn stars

Please restore Barbie Griffin and Adara Michaels, they are seems to be notable. --Haham hanuka 08:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Joe Beaudoin Jr and the discussion here. ❝Sverdrup❞ 13:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I disagree with both of you... --Haham hanuka 14:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

long articles

Thank you for your comments. I am, of course, not trying to own articles, and am well aware of the "editing mercilessly" policy. I was thinking merely of maintaining internal stability in an article while I am in the white-hot throes of creation. It was only a hypothetical question anyway!--Anthony.bradbury 20:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Soil

Know you will be interested in this. The current content is very USA centric, but can be managed. The project would certainly benefit from your international perspective. -- Paleorthid 06:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AID

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Recycling was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Brukerbilde på no

Hei, du har et brukerbilde på no, no:Bilde:User-Sverdrup-2004-04.jpg som er lisensiert med en utfaset lisens, og hvor det står "Do not copy". Kan du være så snill relisensiere det med fri lisens snarest mulig, eller si fra om du vil at det da heller skal slettes. Cnyborg 19:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Å ja, det hadde jeg glemt. Fiksa det nå, gjorde denne endringen her på engelske wikipedia for en stund siden. Takk for meldningen uansett. ❝Sverdrup❞ 21:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement Drive (WP:AID)

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Epic of Gilgamesh was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

You helped choose this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Louvre was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

- Davodd 05:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Economy of Africa

Hi, you were a contributor to this article, which is on the verge of being delisted as a FA. Can you return to help? Urgently requires inline citations and enhanced information in a few places. It's been copy-edited nicely by Peirigill. Tony 04:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ..

.. for your endorsement. It's going to be a tough election (16 candidates and one seat), but I think it's worth a shot. :-)--Eloquence * 11:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Double redirect

Hello, your page m:User:Sverdrup2/monobook.css at Meta is listed as a double redirect. Can you please change it from #REDIRECT User:Sverdrup/monobook.css to #REDIRECT User:Sverdrup/oldcss .

1. User:Sverdrup2/monobook.css (Edit) →‎ User:Sverdrup/monobook.css →‎ User:Sverdrup/oldcss

--1568 04:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed that now. I can't even remember that I had that extra user on meta and what it was for.. ❝Sverdrup❞ 16:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

baseball color line

In this edit, you wrote

"any club including one or more colored persons."

Whom were you quoting? Please see talk:baseball color line. Apparently your information contradicts information added later, and the article has been that way for a long time. Michael Hardy 02:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a hard question! I can't remember, but I have searched around now; I can find something like that quoted at [1], where it says "any club which may be composed of one or more colored persons." I can't say for sure if this was my original source and/or if I modified the quote. I don't think the truth of the statement is at risk, but finding sources is always good (as we think now two years later. Sourcing statements wasn't practice at all in 2004). ❝Sverdrup❞ 15:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

commons:Image:Cyclohexane-structure3.png

Hello, i just move this image on Commons. Some french user want to create http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cyclohexane.PNG but there are a stupid license incompatibility. What do you think about releasing your image in both GFDL and CC-BY-SA-2.5. Have you a Commons account ? And can you update the image description with it ? Thanks a lot. Please say me what you want to do. ~ fr:user:bayo 193.248.39.8 00:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I fixed that. I marked it as PD on commons, since that sounds like the simplest solution for now. ❝Sverdrup❞ 19:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)q[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:U-Svdp.png

Thank you for uploading Image:U-Svdp.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shyam ^(T/C) 10:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New glider image

Hello, Sverdrup! What do you think of replacing Image:GameOfLife.GIF with Image:Animated glider emblem.gif on the pages where it's used, and then being able to "retire" (i.e., delete) GameOfLife.GIF? (As you can tell, I like to keep things simple. :) --Quuxplusone 07:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I shouldn't be the deciding factor here, but I think your image is much better, particularly for use in articles. While perhaps not as clear, my "clipped" version is a bit confusing. You can delete the old one if you want to, but I see there is one use of it here too: User:Green meklar/Userboxes. Regards, ❝Sverdrup❞ 15:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rondane

Hi Sverdrup! I just wanted to tell you that I'm translating the article Rondane National Park, and I'm going to postulate it at featured articles. You can see it here. I know that my english is very strange and full of mistakes, so please tell me if you don't understand what I say :) --Alfonso" 00:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Baudolino-paperback-cover.jpg

Hello, Sverdrup. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Baudolino-paperback-cover.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Sverdrup/Images. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pirates-screenshot-small.png

Hello Sverdrup, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Pirates-screenshot-small.png) was found at the following location: User:Sverdrup/Images. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TextEdit-screenshot.png

Hello Sverdrup, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:TextEdit-screenshot.png) was found at the following location: User:Sverdrup/Images. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Wing Chun practitioners

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Wing Chun practitioners, by 84.66.17.239, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Wing Chun practitioners has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Wing Chun practitioners, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Wing Chun practitioners itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blinkingbutton.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Blinkingbutton.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 16:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article Review

Rondane National Park has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. --RelHistBuff 16:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Normandy review

Battle of Normandy has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. User:Krator (t c) 01:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Telelogic Synergy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Telelogic Synergy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telelogic Synergy. Thank you. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:April Fool's Day has been superseded

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:April Fool's Day, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:April Fool's Day has been superseded by a similar category (typos in name, expanding abbreviations, fixing capitalisation, renaming to comply with the "by country" format and conversions from singular to plural or vice versa). (CSD C2).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:April Fool's Day, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

: )

hey, like ur pic : P ElisaEXPLOSiON ~~talk.~~ 18:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

haha no, you look really good ^^. but yeah, thanks, i didnt even make it haha. one of my friends made it for me. : P im reallt boooredd. ElisaEXPLOSiON ~~talk.~~ 22:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ikiwiki

Fine. I cannot see that much notability per WP guidelines in the article but I am happy to take your word for it since it now seems fairly pervasive. Thanks for letting me know. --BozMo talk 20:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Susning.nu-logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Susning.nu-logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HMX-structure.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:HMX-structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 21:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Propofol-structure.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Propofol-structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 01:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Propranolol-structure.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Propranolol-structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 01:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Putrescine-structure.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Putrescine-structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 01:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MainPage-Camino-Sverdrup(slice).png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MainPage-Camino-Sverdrup(slice).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hans-Blix-IAEA.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hans-Blix-IAEA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fluphenazine-structure.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fluphenazine-structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Human stack.png

File:Human stack.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Human stack.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Human stack.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metaphase.png is now available as Commons:File:Metaphase.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TextEdit-screenshot.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TextEdit-screenshot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. moɳo 00:49, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TextEdit-screenshot.png

A tag has been placed on File:TextEdit-screenshot.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. moɳo 03:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Date-format-1May.png

Thank you for uploading File:Date-format-1May.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Usenet posts containing the word Wikipedia Jan 01 - Feb 04.png

Thank you for uploading File:Usenet posts containing the word Wikipedia Jan 01 - Feb 04.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Abbott

I looked through the revision history of Robert Abbott (game designer), and noticed that you added some stuff when it first started out. I just wanted to let you know that I've written a large amount of stuff for the article, and I am still wanting to go further with it, so if there is any help that you could give me, I would appreciate it. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 03:00, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polydactyly.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Polydactyly.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Niall Williams

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Niall Williams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 11:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Niall Williams

The article Niall Williams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are no reliable third-party sources for this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 11:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Congratulations Sverdrup, your image Image:Oresund.jpg was the Random Picture of the Day! It looked like this:

Random picture of the day

The Øresund bridge connecting Malmö and Copenhagen

Image credit: Sverdrup (talk · contribs)

.

- Presidentman (talk · contribs) (Talkback) Random Picture of the Day 10:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

MSU Interview

Dear Sverdrup,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.115.210 (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to events in June and July: bot, script, template, and Gadget makers wanted

I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon, 1-3 June. Registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, then please register by May 1st and mention it in the registration form.

This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, teaching, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.

We want to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!

I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 02:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Wishing Sverdrup a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 10:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benzene-orbitals2.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Benzene-orbitals2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TextEdit-screenshot.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TextEdit-screenshot.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:10, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Sverdrup,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Scott • talk 10:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Escape Velocity

Category:Escape Velocity, which you created, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Escape Velocity (video game series). If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 03:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beslan-location.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beslan-location.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 01:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nautical lore

Category:Nautical lore, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 21:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for correcting the algorithm on Heap's algorithm and its accompanying illustration! cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 23:16, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow thanks, and thank you for creating the illustration in the first place! sverdrup (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiReader/William Shakespeare/Plays

Wikipedia:WikiReader/William Shakespeare/Plays, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiReader/William Shakespeare/Plays and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiReader/William Shakespeare/Plays during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 05:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aktiv?

Hej Sverdrup, såg just att du verkade ha lämnat SvWiki 2005, och nu verkar det som att du inte varit aktiv här på ett tag. Allt OK? Mvh Dan Koehl (talk) 17:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hejsan. Nej, jag är inte speciellt aktiv. Vad tiden har gått fort dock, jag tänkte att mina senaste edits inte var så länge sedan (Heap's algorithm). sverdrup (talk) 11:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't used the admin tools since 2010, and that was only once. The last time before that was 2008, and even then you only used them 14 times over a 2-week period. Before that, 3 times in 2007. The last time that you used them regularly was in 2006. To sum up, you've used admin tools 18 times in the last decade. You've also barely edited over the same period.

Please do the right thing and resign your admin status rather than making token edits to hang onto it. — Scott • talk 22:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crude-EU28.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crude-EU28.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Desflurane.png

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{Media by uploader}} or {{Presumed self}} tag(s) if present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Rooftiles.JPG

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{Media by uploader}} or {{Presumed self}} tag(s) if present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

IF you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Sverdrup. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Sharon-alone-profile.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sharon-alone-profile.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Sverdrup.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sverdrup. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sverdrup. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Autonomous Learning listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Autonomous Learning. Since you had some involvement with the Autonomous Learning redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 21:20, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sverdrup. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sverdrup. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slogan: Human life begins at conception listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slogan: Human life begins at conception. Since you had some involvement with the Slogan: Human life begins at conception redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Slogan:A woman's right to choose listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slogan:A woman's right to choose. Since you had some involvement with the Slogan:A woman's right to choose redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wave mechanics has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wave mechanics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 04:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Desflurane.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Desflurane.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 15:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Sverdrup,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rondane-location.png

The file File:Rondane-location.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:User-FastFission-brain-frame44.png

The file File:User-FastFission-brain-frame44.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction VI

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction VI on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]