User talk:SuzukS
Image copyright problem with Image:YushinOkami.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:YushinOkami.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Roger Huerta
[edit]I've noticed that you've deleted the "fact" tag from the Roger Huerta page (regarding his fight with Melvin Guillard) a couple of times now. Please don't remove the tag in the future unless you can provide a cite for the factual information. It's against Wikipedia policy to do so, but more importantly, the allegation needs to be properly referenced to improve the article. Thank you! Tuckdogg (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Your concern has been addressed
[edit]Your concern has been addressed on my talk page and I thank you for bringing it up. VP has been persistent in routing messages incorrectly and will be addressed accordingly.Netkinetic (t/c/@) 06:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Record MMA
[edit]The standard format for MMA fighters can be seen here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mixed_martial_arts#Fight_Record_stat_box_.28formatting_.2F_consistency.29
This includes showing the fighters record. Aducci (talk) 14:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- You stop undoing my edits, the way it was is like all other K-1 results, i dont care how ufc results look like. since its part of that promotion we stay like it was.Marty Rockatansky (talk)
- Seems like you gotta bring this up for discussion. what you should have done in the first place. I prefer the existing layout. Your version has everything in bold which seems unnecessary. Marty Rockatansky (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- What you gonna revert this all day. Like i said i prefer the existing layout if you don't like it bring this up for discussion and stop reverting. ufc is not a guideline here.Marty Rockatansky (talk) 12:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Seems like you gotta bring this up for discussion. what you should have done in the first place. I prefer the existing layout. Your version has everything in bold which seems unnecessary. Marty Rockatansky (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rubens Charles
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Rubens Charles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. APK coffee talk 10:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
[edit]
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Rubens Charles. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. APK coffee talk 10:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
APK coffee talk 10:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. APK coffee talk 11:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Edit warring at User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid
[edit]Hello SuzukS. An editor has reported you at WP:AN3 for violating the WP:Three revert rule. Per WP:TALK#User talk pages, users are allowed to remove comments by others from their own talk page. If you persist in restoring your own comment at User talk:AgnosticPreachersKid you may be blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 12:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]An editor that expressed concerns before now completely ignores the sources and wants to say which sources are valid and which isn't. This in no way helps with the wiki article. Please have a say here:Talk:Strikeforce Sea888 (talk) 23:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Melbourne meetup this Saturday
[edit]
|
Melbourne Meetup
|
 | |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 04:48, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Melbourne)
Melbourne meetup
[edit]Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 05:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
[edit] |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 06:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)