User talk:Suviljan

Welcome!

Hello, Suviljan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Michaelas10 (T|C) 22:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Violin string organization

While I agree with you about Sun Microsystems I've tagged the article for deletion as the term appears to be a neologism, unused outside a very small group (probably of disgruntled Sun employees in Finland). As such it fails various Wikipedia criteria for inclusion. If you can cite reliable and verifiable sources to show that this is not the case, please do so. By the way, please say "Hi" to Petri Kallberg if he's still around (and you know him). Regards Tonywalton | Talk 12:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I say, you're welcome to provide supporting evidence. Has it been used in newspapers, for example? I notice that neither the Finnish (you say viulunkieliorganisaatio) nor the English version exist on the fi Wikipedia. If you wish to contest the deletion of the article you may remove the {{dated-prod}} stuff and I'll tag it for AfD (Article for Deletion) instead, where a larger community can discuss it. Tonywalton | Talk 12:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A-25 Song proposed for deletion

== Proposed deletion of A-25 song ==

The article A-25 song has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no claim of notability, no reference for accuracy of rendition, not a notable song per WP:Music etc, not a candidate for wikisource

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I've had a look at the article and I can't see any justification for keeping it, if you think otherwise do let me know GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]