Don't worry about anyone who is having a go at you or pushing you around. As long as you keep good with your sources then you'll be ok. Sometimes people like to take ownership of articles here and they don't like it when you say things that are pretty much right on but aren't a part of their mindset. Whatever evidence you give them will just wind them up and make them angry.
Whatever, you're allowed to edit Wikipedia, so don't let angry people scare you away. As long as you're good, you're good. Enjoy your stay! Hope you bring more interesting stuff to the project.
Yes, I know that young editors may think that I'm attaching them. My point is that this is an encyclopedia that aims to be a serious site, and not an indiscriminate collection of facts paetaining to popular culture. IDM and other similar articles that I recently tagged with a WP:OR template refer to musical scenes and/or musical movements, or to different styles within a same genre, and are not new musical genres. We have just less than 10 real musical genres, in musicology; IDM, and the various atmospheric forms of rhythmic music are just subgenres of pop->technopop. I am a fan of Aphex Twin, The orb and many others since early 1990s. just i find them more similar to Kraftwerk, notthing to do with brian Eno. According to musicological and academic methods this music should be called just "Technopop", or "Instrumental Technopop", or "1990s Wave of Technopop". Every kind of music can be "danced with", even the so called "discomusic and "dance music" should be called just "rhytmic pop" or whatever, haha. I would appreciate if you could forward to other users that I'm not trolling your world. I'm taking this site seriously. ^_^. Doktor Who12:01, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of History of Electronic Music, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://k8er.wordpress.com/electronic-music-genres/electronic-art-music/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot05:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Mr Robot. Thank you greatly for your link to a blog of the man who copied from Wikipedia. I am really happy to see it. I am very sorry that you are a very stupid robot bot. Thank --Susume-eat05:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Susume,
If you wish to move the Electronic art music article to History of Electronic music (not necessarily a bad idea), you should use the "move this page" function rather than copy-paste, since copy-paste destroys the edit history and takes us out of compliance with the GFDL. Thank you! Let me know if you need help. By the way, others may not agree... but you can suggest it on the talk page. Thanks, Antandrus (talk)05:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, someone suggest it already, two people agree, electronic music talk page... :) Sorry for trouble! I'm trying to move now... Let's see. Ok, have a sunny day... *super smiley* nobu
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Electronica, you will be blocked from editing.
This is a standard threat. I don't like this threat very much, it is not very nice, please do not bring this warning here like this in a threat, thank you. It is not welcome. It is very serious.
Your post here is not the serious at all:
{{#if:You might have some good ideas about reorganizing the electronic music articles. But they way you did it caused information to be lost.
Electronica article has the no sources. None for that. The article is nothing but original research.
To change and merge several articles needs to be done carefully.
There is only OR in the article. The new one redirect to the Electronic Music. So simple this taske.
Please don't be in a hurry, discuss your ideas first. You might be on the right track, but you really need to slow down the major changes. Thanks.
My idea is remove OR on sight every time. Thank you and please do not make threats and then follow with poor argument...
(1) When you change my words by putting your own words in between them, I can't understand your reply.
WARNING. NEXT TIME YOU VIOLATE A IMPORTANT RULE OF WIKIPEDIA BY DOING ANOTHER RULE WIKIPEDIA YOU WILL BE GIVEN A HUG AND KISS BY A BEAUTIFUL WOMAN WARNING. DO AS I SAY OR YOU WILL BE BANNED FROM SMOKING IN YOUR AIR CONDITION LIVING ROOM.
So if you want to communicate with me, please put your words separately and not in the middle of mine.
(2) I was not making threats, I was informing you that your behavior is not in accordance with policy. Wikipedia is a collaboration project with policies and guidelines, especially WP:CONSENSUS and WP:CIVIL.
WARNING. YOU WERE MAKING THE THREAT TO BAN SOMEONE WHO WAS TRY TO "Be bold!" BECAUSE YOU "Fence sitting" FOR ONE YEAR. VIOLATES Don't-give-a-fuckism
' WARNING. I HOPE THESE WARNING MAKE YOU SMILE. Have the happiest day! ^-^ seriously... have a warm loving day... have a hug... wish you good luck.. great happiness.. thank - nobu'
There is just some group of ppl here that is blatantly making idiot fun at me inventing words, facts and people that have no grounds in the real world. stop wasting my time you all trolling hoaxes-hoaxing trolls. :D Doktor Who10:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey friend, today I'll be on wikivacation, I'll be back soon. Do not hurry in the meanwhile, otherwise someone will argue that your making just your own point. C ya soon (tomorrow).Doktor Who09:49, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Susume-eat, a warm 'thank you for the barnstar that you awarded to me this morning, it is very much appreciated, and I am proud of it. Cheers, and keep on the good figth.
please do not esitate to contact me whenever some malicious user will report you, I am very experienced in fighting vandals and pretentious users, and I am enough skilled with the use of various "incident reporting" pages. ^_^--Doktor Who21:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Susume-eat, thanks very much for the barnstar! Hope to see you around on other talk pages in good discussions! dil14:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your absence last 2 weeks made me pretty upset, and now you are going to the hospital, :( ; feel free to email me. I agree with you regarding your last edits, ok? <^_^> I wish you all the best, please come back soon.--Doktor Who10:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I am Tagging all of the notable aphex twin pages in search for someone to help me with the creation of "Analogue Bubblebath 5". If you are interested, Please notify me on my user:talk page. thank you. Conkern65 (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conkern65 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
