User talk:Sustainability12345

Welcome!

Hello, Sustainability12345, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! !dave 15:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ria Carlo/Persad

See my reason for undoing. Has she changed her named back to Persad then? !dave 15:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, personal life section noted. Moved to new name. !dave 15:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please use your talk page, here, for WP:BRD purposes, and not continue to revert. These awards have no purpose as to establishing notability here. Notability is whether the subject has been featured in high quality reliable secondary sources where such source has the subject as its main focus. In the nicest way, we're not a trophy cabinet, and lists of awards and accolades are not particularly encyclopedic, and turn 'articles' into 'profiles'. The only why I reverted again is because you overwrote all my changes, not just me removing the awards section. We're both on 2 reverts, one away from when we should both stop, FYI, see WP:3RR. Also, do you have a connection to Ria by any chance? !dave 15:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sustainability12345: Are you reading your talk page messages here? !dave 16:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bryan Benitez McClelland (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by My name is not dave was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads too much like an advertorial for Mr. McClelland.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bryan Benitez McClelland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bryan Benitez McClelland, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

!dave 16:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sustainability12345, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! !dave 16:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello Sustainability12345. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sustainability12345. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sustainability12345|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. !dave 16:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Sustainability12345. Thank you. !dave 16:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan McClelland

Hi, thanks for creating an article on Bryan McClelland. While I believe the subject is notable under WP:GNG. It must state that the way information should be presented shouldn't be promotional or look like an advertisement or resume-like profile for Mclelland. His works on the Bambike had received sufficient coverage in national media in the Philippines and awards are definitely concrete evidence for his notability. However, imo placing the award listing ahead of other sections place WP:UNDUE weight to his "distinctions" and renders the article like a resume. Usually awards or any other listing (filmography for actors, discography for musicians) are placed at the latter part of the article).Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Undisclosed paid editing by Sustainability12345. !dave 08:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bryan McClelland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bryan McClelland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 00:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]