User talk:Sushikim

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sushikim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Run a check user. I'm not related. Only you are not AGF. Sushikim (talk) 18:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, because, clearly, the best way to show that this account isn't a sockpuppet is to create yet another sockpuppet and then try to forum shop your appeal. This is a waste of time for everyone. I'm revoking your talk page access. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sushikim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That is correct. I'm unrelated. I used to edit the page long ago and I just returned to Wikipedia to find that it has since been deleted. I lost my password and had to create a new account. :s Sushikim (talk) 11:37 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Per Huon's rationale below. Not buying it. only (talk) 17:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sushikim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a sock. No proof. RoySmith didn't even notify me that I was blocked. Sushikim (talk) 17:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So you're totally unrelated to those sockpuppets involved in Sabrina Ho and Draft:Sabrina Ho, and your first edit on Wikipedia was to request a deletion review for a page deleted a week ago? Sorry, I don't believe that. Huon (talk) 17:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.