User talk:SusanLesch/Archives/2021/May

June 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201 Online events: New: Wiki Loves Pride | June Junes | Jewellers & Watchmakers Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Women in Europe contest Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Looking for advice based on your contributions to the Minneapolis article

Hello SusanLesch,

I've been in the process of editing the Buffalo, New York article off and on now for about six years. This past month however, I've spent quite a bit of time editing it in an attempt to get it to GA status, with the eventual goal of FA status one day.

Every day I go to edit it, I discover something new that I didn't know about the city, mainly with Google Scholar and the Wikipedia Library service. The Minneapolis article has in some ways been a template for me over the past month since it's been recently reviewed, and your comments and insight there have been helpful as well.

I'd like to know, what general advice do you have for researching a broad topic like a city? How do you cover everything important in a succinct way? Thank you, Buffaboy ^talk 07:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi. The Minneapolis article existed before I joined Wikipedia. When I started WP:MINNESOTA was strong and I used WP:USCITIES. Good luck. -SusanLesch (talk) 12:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Interesting, thank you! Buffaboy ^talk 16:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

My only suggestion is that one sentence is out of place: "Minneapolis was fairly well…” it's out of chronological order and should appear later. Rjensen (talk) 16:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC)