User talk:Surlyduff50

Discussion on images

Please be aware of WP:CANVASS. --Boson (talk) 23:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Househould names"

Hi Surly! Perhaps sometimes there's more than just a gut feeling to a topic? Well, to fashion there certainly is, even though it's driven by emotions. See & see. Cheers, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 03:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I get that Karl Lagerfeld is a well-known fashion designer, but so what? Claudia Schiffer is a model and "creative director" of her own clothing label. She also has the advantage of being a household name (valid term!) - as with most of the other individuals with photographs on this page. Karl Lagerfeld = very well known in the fashion industry, not so well-known to the general reader (perhaps outside of Germany). Claudia Schiffer = very well known in the fashion industry, also very well known to lots of people without much knowledge of the fashion industry. Surlyduff50 (talk) 13:37, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now if you could provide any sources to add some substance backing your claims, I'd be more than happy. ;) -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 14:02, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on White people. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dawn Bard (talk) 02:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.49.243.63 (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Cheryl Cole, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Your edits violate the terms of WP:COMMONNAME and Cheryl's talk page. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 21:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anglo-Saxons may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

and up until the [[Norman conquest of England|Norman conquest]].ref name="Higham, Nicholas J. 2013">Higham, Nicholas J., and Martin J. Ryan. The Anglo-Saxon World. Yale University Press, 2013.</ref>
Colgrave|1940|p=104}} cited by {{harvnb|Stenton|1987|p=88}}</ref>}} and in his memory a gospel (known as the [[St Cuthbert Gospel]] was placed in his coffin. The decorated leather [[bookbinding]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]