User talk:Surgeonsmate

This user may have left Wikipedia. Surgeonsmate has not edited Wikipedia since 17 October 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

It seems that nobody has got around to saying Welcome!

Hello, Surgeonsmate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Slac speak up! 23:35, 5 September 2005 (UTC).[reply]

I couldn't agree more :). Slac speak up! 02:19, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

HMAS Brisbane picture

The image on the HMAS Brisbane page is the best one I could find that complied with the draconian copyright rules over images on here. If you can find a better one, that does comply with the rules, then I would be delighted to have that on there instead. Hammersfan 13.52 GMT, 23 January 2006.

The Ritz

Thanks for your note. The amusing thing (well, it amuses me, anyway) is that I don't normally edit Ritz Hotel. A spammer had added commercial links to some of the articles on Las Vegas casinos that I watch. Vegaswikian got most of them. I got the rest and checked the spammer's contributions to see what else he'd been up to. That's how I came to look at the Ritz article. Thus, the ultimate effect of his spamming was to correct your oversight about the image. Wikimagic at work! JamesMLane 19:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AWMEternalFlame.jpg

Thanks for the comment on Image:AWMEternalFlame.jpg! I do not know how to adjust the tilt but if you know how to feel free and do it. --robz0r 04:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Punting pictures

Many thanks for adding your picture of punting in Christchurch NZ. Do you have any more information about punting there? Preferably with some verifiable references. I'd like to see the "punting round the world" section expanded a little. Thruston 15:50, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed widths for images

Now that WP users can set a preference for the size of thumbnails, I think that there is no good reason to put fixed widths on thumbnail images, so I'm taking them off again. Please object on the talk page for Punt (boat) if you disagree. Thruston 15:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IIII vs IV

IIII is nonstandard and confusing (I mistook it for III), and even our own article on the tank refers to it as the Mark IV. What's the advantage to using IIII? Night Gyr 20:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clockfaces are an exception, see Roman_Numerals#IIII_or_IV.3F. Night Gyr 21:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Port Arthur

Eek, I don't know what happened there. Would you be able to replace the old theories section without eliminating the rest of my de-crappification? Rebecca 08:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the same. I'll keep an eye out for any more of the same on my watch. Rebecca 07:34, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Posting links

Hi, please don't post links to any website that give personal information about another Wikipedian, whether that Wikipedian has left or not. The page you recreated has now been deleted a second time. Thanks. AnnH ♫ 23:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I didn't think it had been done in bad faith. :-) AnnH ♫ 23:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I'm apparently blocked as a sockpuppet of Blissyu2. Could somebody check my edits on Port Arthur massacre where I've been discussing POV pushing by an anon user identified as Blissyu2? --Surgeonsmate 23:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen your request, but I don't know enought about the background to make a decision. Undoing another admin's block without discussion is strongly discouraged, as the blocking admin often has information that the uninvolved admin doesn't have. I will, however, make sure that the admin who blocks you is aware that you are contesting the block, just in case it's a case of mistaken identity. If you are unconneccted to Blissyu2, you have nothing to worry about, except the inconvenience of not being able to edit for a day. You can continue to post messages on this page, though. Hope that helps. AnnH ♫ 15:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ann! I think it is a bit high-handed to impose an indefinite block without checking the facts. I'm not Blissyu2/Internodeuser. I've been reverting the edits of that person and trying to get them to follow wikirules. Here's the edit counts for:

A checkuser request would also show there's no similarity. A look at user contributions shows completely different patterns. Internodeuser looks to have been an AfD warrior whereas I have hopefully been a productive participant with contributions that are overwhelminly in articlespace.

On investigating the circumstances further, I am quite angry that Katefan0 has left the project as a result of her name being exposed. Looking back on her edits she seems to have been a diligent and productive admin and contributor, an asset to Wikipedia. I am sorry that I poked my nose in, but it seemed to me that I could help explain why she had left. Now I see that this only added to the trouble and made more work for you. Sorry. --Surgeonsmate 19:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you, and I apologize for my over-hasty reaction. ➥the Epopt 22:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Natasha Stott Despoja Crop.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Natasha Stott Despoja Crop.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Photos

I've put your photo of the Ritz in the Dover Street article and wonder if there are any more available of the locality, particularly Dover Street and Albemarle Street. Tyrenius 07:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:JennyKendallTobiasComic.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:JennyKendallTobiasComic.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JennyKendallTobiasBusted.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JennyKendallTobiasBusted.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Heart of Tony Bennett.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The Heart of Tony Bennett.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Alx 91 (talk) 04:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:The Ritz on Piccadilly.JPG

File:The Ritz on Piccadilly.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:The Ritz on Piccadilly.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:The Ritz on Piccadilly.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:FatherGoose.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:FatherGoose.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Booked Up In Archer City.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tim Tam.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tim Tam.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:58, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBCRadioGuernseySticker.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BBCRadioGuernseySticker.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Andrew Wardrobe Service Board.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:St Andrew Wardrobe Service Board.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pink Ladies (support group)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pink Ladies (support group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SITH (talk) 15:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PinlkLadiesLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PinlkLadiesLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]