User talk:Surgeon123

July 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to RCSI-Bahrain. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 12:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from RCSI-Bahrain without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Denisarona (talk) 17:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mohamed CJ. I noticed that you recently removed some content from RCSI-Bahrain without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mohamed CJ (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How can I establish these changes i made to the page ( Surgeon123 (talk) 09:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC) )[reply]

Your changes were blanking of the article without giving a valid reason. As I have explained in my talk page, these changes are not helpful to the encyclopedia and would almost always be reverted by other more experienced editors. Improving the article can be done by adding more content that is sourced to reliable sources and not by blanking it. Mohamed CJ (talk) 09:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But if the referenced material is innaccurate how can I remove it? (Surgeon123 (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

If you think the sources are unreliable, then you can discuss their reliability in the Reliable sources noticeboard. If you think the content in the article doesn't match what is stated in the sources, then you can tag the content with Template:Failed verification. For the article in discussion, I don't think any of these two situations apply, but you are of course welcome to express your opinion. Mohamed CJ (talk) 11:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at RCSI-Bahrain, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 13:10, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a section on this where I can talk in private with you on this page? (Surgeon123 (talk) 13:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)) I am not trying to be disruptive but there is material on this page which does not reflect RCSI Bahrain as an educational institution(Surgeon123 (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at RCSI-Bahrain, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: RCSI-Bahrain was changed by Surgeon123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925061 on 2014-04-11T10:07:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:07, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neuromod Devices (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Surgeon123/sandbox/Neuromod Devices and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Surgeon123/sandbox/Neuromod Devices, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Surgeon123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Surgeon123/sandbox/Neuromod Devices

Hello, Surgeon123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Surgeon123/sandbox/Neuromod Devices, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]