User talk:Surendranath Nayak

Welcome!

Hello, Surendranath Nayak, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sanghamitra Mohanty, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nerd1a4i (talk) 23:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanghamitra Mohanty

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sanghamitra Mohanty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nerd1a4i (talk) 23:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Surendranath Nayak/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Surendranath Nayak/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Surendranath Nayak, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 12:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It will be appended gradually. Please do not delete.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odisha Bigyan Academy (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has notability issues and tone issues. It reads promotionally. It does not describe what third parties have written about the organization. The references are not properly formatted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odisha Bigyan Academy (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reference formatting issues have been resolved, but nothing else. Cannot accept at this time. Please address the concerns of the previous reviewers, thank you!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odisha Bigyan Academy (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odisha Bigyan Academy (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

Formatting makes the article appear as if it has simply been copy-pasted from another source. This is not suitable for Wikipedia in it's current form

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Discuss 05:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odisha Bigyan Academy (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission shows no conformity to any guidelines and most importantly: previous issues were not addressed at all. Do follow the reviews and improve the article before resubmitting it again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 08:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy

Greetings. It's unfortunate that you did not come forward to any previous reviewers for guidance any sooner. In any case, your submission has issues of: notability, references and promotional tone.

Notability and references are closely linked together. If your references consist of reliable sources, then notability will be established. This is called claim of significance as the quality sources that you give will reaffirm the notability of the article. Another guide about notability would be WP:NSCHOOL. Many reviewers have viewed your submission to be not notable. However, that could be improved depending on how well you present the submission.

For referencing, read WP:RS. Articles require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. References about the subject — at least one lengthy paragraph, preferably more. Not passing mentions, not directory listings, not just any old thing that happens to have the name in it. Published sources that have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. A major newspaper, a factual, widely-published book, high-quality generally trusted mainstream publications. Not blogs, MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, fansites, Twitter, wikis, or other sites with user-generated content. The content of the article must be verifiable. Nothing written by the subject, paid for by the subject, or affiliated with the subject. Not their website, and not a press release. The sources must be independent.

For your promotional tone, read WP:PUFFERY. There are some words that would tip your article over to a promotional end. Those words of course would be best avoided as it will result in your submission being deleted. Moreover, avoid writing the article in a promotional way, as if your submission is extracted from a brochure. Read WP:NPOV. The SAMANTA CHANDRA SEKHAR AWARD would be considered promotional.

Example: Odisha Bigyan Academy, a none profit organisation is an unique Institution of Odisha, which has been conceptualized, nurtured and established by Professors and Academicians in Science and Technology to popularize scientific ideas, technological innovations among students and general public along with showcasing scientific research activities in the State under one umbrella.

Those words in italics are under WP:PUFFERY where they are often deemed not to be concrete. And, try to familiarise yourself with the encyclopaedic manner of writing, which is immensely different from that of editorial style of writing. Try to read WP:MS too and browse on Wikipedia for other famous academies or universities to know exactly the formatting layout for your submission. If you have any questions, you can always post it to the AfC Helpdesk, link at the declination banner. EROS ^message 13:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have modified the Draft of Odisha Bigyan Academy as per your guidelines. Hope it will publishable now. Kindly let me know if anything else is to be done.

MfD nomination of Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy

Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Odisha Bigyan Academy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. KJP1 (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have Modified the draft as per the reviewer Heliosxeros‬ on 29th April. I ma ready to do the next phase of modification if suggested any. Please do not delete the draft Odisha Bigyan Academy.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odisha Bigyan Academy

Odisha Bigyan Academy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:36, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Esteemed Wikipedia Team have sanctioned a glad moment to me today by publishing the "Odisha Bigyan Academy", which is an item of Science and Technology based on the best of truth and value for benefit of every science loving person. Thank you so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.19.194.14 (talk) 14:22, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]