User talk:Surena (usurped)

The Lion and Sun

Hi. Unfortunately, the educational purpose license of the source is incompatible with the any purpose license on Wikipedia. I am afraid I have to delete the article. Sorry -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just removed the copyrighted parts, the intro and the images are still there. Hope this helps -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chris. Upon my request (dated 31 December 2006) CAIS has released its copyright of the article in question to Wikipedia. There is any entry at the bottom of their webpage [1] to confirm the above. Surena 11:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. I have undone my change, the entire article is as it was before now. Many many thanks for contacting them and asking for permission! That is wonderful, and it is a very nice article on a topic that is often overlooked by the usually western centric Wikipedians like myself. Best wishes and happy editing -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Surena 11:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Page Protection

Hello there, I recently noticed you incorrectly placed a request for page protection under the bot reports at the AIV page. If you are interesting in seeking page protection please refer to WP:RFPP instead. Follow the directions on the page before submitting the request. Regards,¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Dear Surena

I think you have expertise on history of Iran. During last month I worked on this article. I would like to invite you to see the article, comment on it and help in improving it. I would like to invite you to see the parts on Iranian culture in particular. dastetoon dard nakoneh! Sina Kardar 19:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your comments and helps. That's very kind of you. Shaad bashid. Sina 09:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Persianization Article

Hi. Please see the page 122:

The steps that the Teheran regime took in the 1930s with the aim of Persianization of the Azeris and other minorities appeared to take a leaf from the writings of the reformist-minded intellectuals in the previous decade. In the quest of imposing national homogeneity on the country where half of the population consisted of ethnic minorities, the Pahlavi regime issued in quick succession bans on the use of Azeri on the premises of schools, in theatrical performances, religious ceremonies, and, finally, in the publication of books. Azeri was reduced to the status of a language that only could be spoken and hardly ever written. As the Persianization campaign gained momentum, it drew inspiration from the revivalist spirit of Zoroastrian national glories. There followed even more invasive official practices, such as changing Turkic-sounding geographic names and interference with giving children names other than Persian ones. While cultivating cordial relations with Kemalist Turkey, Reza Shah carried on a forceful de-Turkification campaign in Iran.

Regards, Grandmaster 18:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

salam

te'daadi az doostan be man tazakkor dadan ke dorost karadane safheh baraie bazi afrad mesle salimi namin va puorpiar dorost nist chon in afrad "notable" nistand. man oon safheh ro enteghal dadam. khahesh mikonam inja ro bebinid: link. omidvaram shoma ham movafegh bashid. ba sepaas. Sina Kardar 15:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just found this article. The last two pages are interesting:[2] Sina Kardar 19:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Revolution

See Talk:Iranian_Revolution#Requested_move.--Patchouli 23:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dorood Surena, ey aziz midonam ke enghelab kheily jaleb va dar ghesmatha melli bood, va yadet nareh ke naam in enghelab, be name enghelabe eslami marouf shod. Baz ham migam, baleh baziya melli boodan, baziya tudehi boodan, bazi ya ino oon boodan. Vali oon Emam bood ke goft aabo noonen majanni midam, ke mardome addi ro gool zad. pas fekresho nakon va be ayandeh benegah, ke tarikh oon enghelab dar gozashteyeh tareek ast, iran zamin chizike dar ayandeh khahad dasht manandeh enghelabe mashroutiyat, yek enghelabe irani khahad bood. pas ayande negar basht va oon enghelabo faramoosh kon. p.s. oon naghashito kheily khosham oomad. Ey val! --Rayis 10:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected your good-faith error. On April 1, after a landslide victory in a national referendum in which only one choice was offered (Islamic Republic: Yes or No), Ayatollah Khomeini declared an Islamic republic with a new Constitution reflecting his ideals of Islamic government[3]. So 1979, not 1980.--Patchouli 11:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrus

Dorud, I think these articles\sections are suffering from WP:AWW, e.g. "as there are passages in the text have been interpreted as expressing Cyrus’ respect for humanity. It promotes a form of religious tolerance and freedom"

You seem to have a great knowledge of history so it would be great if you could have a quick look and give your views if there are any problems. Keep it cool. --Rayis 21:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Self-linking_in_dispute_by_a_scholar --Rayis 11:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sivand dam

Salaam!

As you probably know, the Sivand dam is going to be initiated in a week. I covered the issue in here. We need to cover the issue properly in wikipedia. Unfortunately there has been not much international reactions up to now. Ba sepaas. Sina Kardar 22:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also wrote a bit about "Karun 3 dam" and Izeh. Sina Kardar 22:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the link. It was very useful. Sina Kardar 15:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks

The prferred means of linking is [[Assyrian]]s, not [[Assyrian|Assyrians]] (see Piped link#Use). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Persian Speakers

Dear Surena, I saw the map which you created and included in the history of persian language page, i find some mistakes in it, for example some parts were not considered (not included), Some were included inaccurate, Sorry for writing about justifition, i just wanted to telling you that it is not required since a indo-iranian language template is there --Ali 18:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian languages

Please if it is possible for you add these mazandarani (tabarian) words in the table of iranian languages, since i can not find enough environment to adding it Below are the meaning of the words
little -> atəke/pətik/bechuk/perushk; wolf -> Varg/Gəorge; Yesterday -> Arezen / direz; woman -> Zəna ; wind -> wa; water -> owe; want -> bexanen; three -> thə; spring -> vehar; son -> rika / pisser; sister -> xaxer; say -> baoren / genen; read -> baxinden / beshenen; pig -> xi; open -> va hekarden; night -> sheow; name -> num; mother -> mar; moon -> mitra; man -> merdi; language -> ziwan; hunger -> veyshna; house -> səre; horse -> Istar; heart -> dil; head -> kalə; hand -> dess; great -> gat/ belang/ pila; good -> xar; go -> shunen/ burden; fire -> tesh/ balənga; finger -> angoos father -> piyer; evening -> Nmashun; egg -> merqana; die -> bamirden; door -> bəli; do -> hakerden; day -> rez/ reoj; daughter -> kija/ dether; dark -> Siyo; cry -> bərmə/ qa; come -> enen; brother -> birar; bring -> biyarden; blood -> xin; bread -> nan; earth -> zemi/ cham/ ater; fear -> perva/ təshəpash/ ters;

My reference is dictionary of tabari, [you may search it] --Ali 09:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Bandeh ro sharmandeh kardid! Ba sepaas e faravan. Paidar bashid va be omide rooz haie behatar. Sina Kardar 17:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

db-histmerge and hangon

You placed {{hangon}} on a page I tagged for history merge. The db-histmerge tag does not lead to permanent deletion of a page; the page merely needs to be deleted temporarily because it was moved by a cut-and-paste move. Cut-and-paste moves disrupt the history of a page, and remove attribution information (information about who wrote the page), and so can be a violation of copyright. The temporary deletion is needed so that the page history can be moved into the correct place; to repeat, this is not a permanent deletion, and the page will be restored soon after the history is merged. I would suggest you remove the {{hangon}} tag. Thanks! --ais523 12:00, 30 January 2007 (U T C)

Cut and paste moves/renames

Put simply, don't do them. By doing this you lose the original edit history of the article, there is a move facility within the software which should be used. See Help:Move --pgk 12:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

See Template_talk:History_of_Iran#History_of_Greater_Iran. --Mardavich 18:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Surena 18:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aramaic Wiktionary

Seeing your knowledge in Aramaic, I believe that you may be interested in something that has been recently proposed on Meta. If you'd like to help us get the Aramaic Wiktionary established, please add your name to the "Users interested in forming an editing community" section, and voice your support in the section labeled "Arguments in favour". Thanks! :-) אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) • Give Back Our Membership! 06:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persianate society

Removing a "merge" template isn't a correction, as your edit summary stated. Note also:

Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks! --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you simply deleted my comment (incorrectly marking the edit as minor); I deduce that courtesy is something with which you're unacquainted. My points remains. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persianate society

The singular isn't an error, it's the Wikipedia manual-of-style naming convention. Please don't go against it. Also, the first reference in the article doesn't in fact back up anything that's said, being merely a link to a society's page which says nothing about the subject (at least, not that I could find). --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that Wikipedia policy is to misinform, as you are implying here. The Wikipedia manual-of-style naming convention is not applied here; and if what you are claiming here is correct, therefore you should change the following articles from plural form to singular: United States, Allies, Society Islands, etc. If you conduct a Google search for "Persianate society (in singular form), you would get only 10 results including the Wikipedia article; - however, if you change your search title to the "Persianate Societies (plural and correct term), 824 results -- Thus this shows the correct term. However, I don't believe that you are an expert in this field, and therefore, you should stop deleting, and if you are not happy with the entry, just add ^{[citation needed]} to the body of the text, to request further citation(s). Surena 12:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States, Allies, and Society Islands are not analogous; there is no entity called "Persianate societies". The fact that most people refer to such societies (in the plural) is irrelevant to the naming convention.

Your revert of my edit is also unacceptable; not only have you reverted to a version in very poor English, but the supposed citation doesn't in fact back up anything that's said in the lead. If your intention is to justify your claim about the article title, then take it to Talk — but it doesn't do that (any more than the existence of the Society for Christian philosophers would justify an article called "Christian philosophers" rather than "Christian philosopher"). --Mel Etitis (Talk) 12:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not only extreme bad manners simply to delete another editor's explanation without comment, it suggests bad faith. Your revert of my editing, which included many improvements to the English and the style of the article, with an edit summary which (though in garbled English) accused me of vandalism is unacceptable. If you continue to behave in this way, you may find yourself blocked from editing.

Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines, policies, and especuially manual of style. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 12:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that, if you revert my edits again, you will have violated WP:3RR, which brings a twenty-four hour editing block. Please don't. If you wish to discuss the article here, or at the Talk page, I'm happy to do so — but you must drop this idea that you're an expert and so others mustn't correct you. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 12:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your photos

Ba dorud.

Although this massage may bother you but I should tell you that I put distributed tag on some of the photos which you've uploaded comprising:[4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and [9] .

I put this tag on these images whether I like them or not.--Sa.vakilian 06:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for bringing to my attention. I have corrected the licensing tags and summaries, after checking my records of their sources. However, you still be able to dispute the sources, by placing a depute tag, to be checked by administrators - but please do not remove the current tags. Bā Sepās - Surena 07:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iran Consensus

Can you revert your change in numbering for those pictures and just leave a blank for the missing number? It throws off all of our votes, so unless you intend to correct them, it is probably better to leave a blank. The Behnam 07:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, though I do think we need to remove the actual picture itself. I'm not entirely sure, but that is what Future Perfect at Sunrise seemed to be saying. I'm thinking we'll just have to leave a blank, and all votes for that picture will not be counted. The Behnam 07:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting a legitimate version of the image. Now we can keep it, and probably reintroduce it into articles it was removed from. I think the best place to start for that is Future Perfect's contribs, since he seemed to do all of the removal of the original version of the picture. The Behnam 07:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Usurpation

Hello, Surena. A request has been made at Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations to usurp, or "take over", your username because you have not used it to edit, and another user would like to use it to edit. Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations says that any unused username may be usurped if the user is given seven days notice to object and does not do so.

If you have an email set in your preferences, you should be getting an email from a bureaucrat or changing username clerk explaining how to consent or object to this process.

If you do not object to being renamed to a new username in order for another user to use the name you currently have, please log in and post a reply here saying so (you may also tell us what username you would like to be renamed to, or we will provide you with a generic one).

If you do nothing: the request will be filled after seven days, and your account will be moved to a generic username. You may request that it be moved to a new username of your choice at any time.

If you object to being renamed: please log in and make an edit to this page clearly stating that you object to usurpation.

Please note that even if your current username is usurped, you can still edit and your data will not be lost; your preferences, watchlist, and other user settings will be transferred to a new username.

Thank you for your time. Passrain (talk) 21:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]