User talk:Surelyshubham

Joe Mesmar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joe Mesmar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia; links to online media are not enough). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Mesmar (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. The artist's website is a primary source and not an independent reference. Soundcloud, Spotify, Beatport and Youtube are not reliable or acceptable sources. Neither are blog sites, such as MTL Blog.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe Mesmar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joe Mesmar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Surelyshubham! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Mesmar

The article Joe Mesmar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

substantial copy of Draft:Joe Mesmar that has already been declined. Fails WP:NMusician.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Mesmar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joe Mesmar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you thinking that I am doing Promotional advertising to Wikipedia? I just want to write the article of Joe Mesmar who deserves a Wikipedia page. That's it. Surelyshubham (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use language like "top best-selling" or "His passion shined through his playing style." Summarize professional independent sources in a way that even people who hate him can agree with. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to what Ian.thomson said (which is entirely correct), the deleted article contains things like: He is best known for his remixes. (this is "sourced" to a Soundcloud link which does not support the "best known" assertion at all, so best known by whom, according to whom? This is weasel wording), had picked up the sticks and began teaching himself the drums. ("picked up the sticks" is an inappropriate informal "get to know ya" tone; just "began teaching himself the drums" suffices to make the point), energetic live performances with innovative remixes intertwined with original material. (full of puff terms; "energetic", "innovative", etc.). The rest of the article carried on that way. Wikipedia articles must be neutral in both tone and content, and material in them must be directly verified by reliable and independent sources. If sources don't verify how much he loved music as a kid, leave stuff like that out. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Surelyshubham, nobody on Earth "deserves" a Wikipedia article. Articles exist because material (published,reliable sources) cover them in depth. That may not have happened with your artist friend yet. Any attempt at an article right now is promotional. You must wait for the media to catch up to your friend's great talent and achievements, and write about them extensively.--Quisqualis (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Surelyshubham. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Interstellarity (talk) 20:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Surelyshubham! You created a thread called Please Check my Sandbox and let me know if the article is correct for publishing at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mesmar Performing on Costa Rica.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Mesmar Performing on Costa Rica.jpeg, which you've attributed to Joe Mesmar. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Mesmar (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe Mesmar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joe Mesmar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Surelyshubham (talk) 17:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Can you tell me if the article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Joe_Mesmar is eligible to be published?

Posting to your own talk page is like talking to yourself. See User:Ian.thomson/Guide#Getting_around_the_site for more info why.

As for Draft:Joe Mesmar, the only professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic source that is independent of Mesmar is this Vice piece. You need at least two more sources like that one. What you really need to do is find three or more sources like that, summarize and cite them, then paraphrase the summary -- don't waste your time or the reviewer's time with anything else, just put up the distilled proof of notability. Formatting (beyond inline citations for sources) and pictures are a waste of time, do that after the article is approved. Affiliated sources, such as interviews, are a waste of time until after the article is approved because they do not prove notability. User generated sources like Discogs {{sup|([[[[Wikipedia:RSP#Discogs|see RSP entry}}) are not reliable sources so never use them (even after the article is approved). Never bother with sites that sell or play his music, either. See User:Ian.thomson/Howto for step-by-step instructions on that. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:39, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Mesmar Performing on Costa Rica.jpeg

Hello, Surelyshubham. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Mesmar Performing on Costa Rica.jpeg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Surelyshubham. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Joe Mesmar, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Waggie (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joe Mesmar

Hello, Surelyshubham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joe Mesmar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]