User talk:Supremebeanie

Supremebeanie, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Supremebeanie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 01:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Supremebeanie! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — Newslinger talk 01:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Newslinger. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on VDARE, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! — Newslinger talk 01:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

and on Havana syndrome you made a similar edit.Slatersteven (talk) 10:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geogene (talk) 11:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diff [1]. Geogene (talk) 11:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Nick Fuentes, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:06, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell you have never been blocked.Slatersteven (talk) 18:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from edits which doesn't have proper citations and not related to the topic. Your recent edit [2] to 2020 Summer Olympics has been reverted due to Wikipedia policy for vandalism you can use your sandbox for testing. Thank you. Quantumtunneling (talk) 18:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is claer this is a wp:nothere account.Slatersteven (talk) 18:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Supremebeanie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hacked.

Decline reason:

Once an account has been reported as compromised or "hacked" it cannot be unblocked. We have no way of knowing who is in control of the account now. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 22:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You should have reported this before the block.Slatersteven (talk) 11:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]