User talk:Supreme Math Expert

May 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:39, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Quadratic formula. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:39, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Product rule. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at L'Hôpital's rule. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leibniz's notation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just fuck off and stop spamming?Supreme Math Expert (talk) 3 May 2015 (UTC)}

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Exponentiation, you may be blocked from editing. Anythingyouwant (talk) 06:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cate Blanchett, you may be blocked from editing. Anythingyouwant (talk) 06:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Supreme Math Expert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very very sorry and I was only joking so pls unblock me. Didn't know this was against policy. Supreme Math Expert (talk) 06:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You hadd all the warnings above to tell you it was wrong. Max Semenik (talk) 07:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Supreme Math Expert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry. I have read policy. I won't do this again. Please. Supreme Math Expert (talk) 11:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure why you would logically have supposed your edits were acceptable. Pass. Kuru (talk) 12:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.