User talk:Suppple

This is Suppple's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Suppple/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suppple! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Suppple (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Claytonmott (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I do not want to post an advertorial, I will be compensated from the the company, I work as an independent copywriter. The company wants to lend credibility and trust to their brand and they believe Wikipedia is the best and most trustworthy source to do this. I definitely understand that Wikipedia does not allow self promotion, I simply want to contribute in a way that is fair and honest. The company mentioned in the article does not stand to gain any recognition from having a wikipedia page. After much research I realise my mistakes and will not be making them again. I need to include more credible citations from unbiased 3rd parties, not from paid media sponsors. I have joined forums that will help make sure my content is of the standards required and verified. I want this to factual and lend to the credibility of Wikipedia

Decline reason:

You will need to make the Terms of Use-required paid editing disclosure. The company is dead wrong; Wikipedia has no interest in giving credibility and trust to any topic- we're not concerned with things like enhancing search results or knowledge panels in Google(for which the presence of a Wikipedia article is only one possible input). We also have, quite frankly, no interest in helping you make money. Most of us are volunteers and don't get paid to be here. It's up to you to figure out how to properly edit here. Before we permit you to indirectly contribute about clients we will want to see an extensive edit history of edits in areas unrelated to your conflict of interest that demonstrates your understanding of relevant Wikipedia policies like those regarding content, sourcing, and style. If that's okay with you, you'll need to tell us what topics you might edit about that are unrelated to your clients. You may do that in a new request, I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 09:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]