User talk:Support Innovations

Speedy deletion nomination of Support Innovations

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Support Innovations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the page that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Stalwart111 (talk) 03:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia.

Thanks for creating the article on your company. There are, as you can imagine, certain criteria that are required to be filled before we have an article about something. The most important one is notability. This is described at Wikipedia:Notability.

If an someone thinks the subject is not notable, and no evidence can be provided it is liable to be deleted. For this reason it's worth looking for some sources as described in the page Wikipedia:Notability.

There are also a number of other issues you should be aware of, firstly the article should not be written in the first person and as a promotional piece, but as a neutral factual article. Secondly you should be aware of the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest policy. Thirdly you need to find a personal account name, not a corporate account name, these sort of account names aren't allowed. Rich Farmbrough, 03:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

OK further to the above, the article has been deleted, as "not asserting notability of the organization" - usually you would get a message about this and be able to object. Probably the best way to create anew article if you believe that it can meet the notability criteria, is through the articles for creation system. Rich Farmbrough, 04:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

As Rich says, even after he kindly rewrote it I could find no assertion that the subject was notable according to Wikipedia's inclusion standards. If you can find supporting material that covers the organization, and which, in particular, makes a case for more than local notability, that would alter the case. I was unable to find anything in that line. Acroterion (talk) 11:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Support Innovations", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, institution, company or website. Please note that Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or appear to be shared by multiple people. Please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. NTox · talk 17:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 17:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Support Innovations (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Wikipediaisranbybitches (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I totally did not know that about wikipedia. I always thought that organization and company posts were actually written by those companies and organizations, not just dumb people who think they know everything and have nothing else better to do. So I apologize for taking up your time. However, I really do not appreciate being BANNED from an entire site due to a misunderstanding. I hope you can find some mercy in your hearts to free my bound hands, and reinstate my freedom of speech. As far as I know, we still hold that as an importance and a right in America.

Decline reason:

I reverted your previous unblock requests to give you another shot at coming up with something that might indicate you are here to contribute constructively. However, given you attitude toward Wikipedia, as evidenced by your requested username, I see no point in continuing this nonsense further. Kinu ^t/_c 05:28, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Kinu ^t/_c 05:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]