User talk:Supersonicsong

Jacob Kirkegaard

I have reverted your edits on Jacob Kirkegaard because they added copyright material from another website. This is wholly unacceptable on Wikipedia. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:45, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jacob Kirkegaard, by copying material from another website. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Velella, The website I am copying from is my own! www.fonik.dk is my own website about my sound works. I am running fonik.dk and I am the only webmaster on this page. I was updating wikipedia's page by copying from MY OWN text on my website because it was outdated. There is therefore no copyright claims.

Please revert your reversion so my update becomes active. Thank you

We need to have documentation that shows the copyright holders have given permission for the material to be copied to this website. Wikipedia has procedures in place for this purpose. Please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. Regardless of the copyright issue, material you might use on your own website is very unlikely to be suitable for inclusion in a Wikipedia article.

A second problem is conflict of interest. Working on an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. Editing a biography about yourself is acceptable only if you are removing unambiguous vandalism or clear-cut and serious violations of our biography of living persons policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy right violations

I will try and be as specific as I can be. Much of the content that you have added derives from this website. On this website there is no information about licensing and so, following wikipedia's rules, it is assumed to be copyright. Any copying or close paraphrasing is thus a copyright violation. This is not negotiable unless all the material is licensed with a licence compatible with Wikipedia or the copyright is donated to Wikipedia - see donating copyright. Secondly, Wikipedia has no evidence at to your identity of relationship with the subject of the article. You may be the same person, you may be his agent, a relative, a paid editor or simply another editor. We have no means of verifying that you are who you say your are. So will I revert my text deletion - no I will not. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Well, while I understand that copyright claims have to be respected I find it unfortunate that it is so difficult to correct outdated information about my own person. As you can see on my website (the link that you link to) it is about the same person. The wikipedia page even refers to that very website (fonik.dk) So why would it infringe of any copyright? As you can see on fonik.dk I've made no copyright claim to my bio. Furthermore I don't understand why you also delete my updated discography?

So one last question; would I be able to update the text if I change the words slightly from my bio on the fonik.dk web page? FYI I have no clue who uploaded the initial information about me on wikipedia and I've for a long time been wanting to correct it so it corresponds is actually correct. I respect your justified attempt to keep up with copyright but I also hope that the system isn't so rigid that one can't even correct misleading or false information.

PS. You're rightly claiming that you cannot know that I am actually me. But I would hereby like to prove that I am me and the actual owner / webmaster of my own website. Please have a look at the link you were referring to. I have uploaded a little greeting to you at the bottom; http://fonik.dk/about.html

If you add content in your own words which are clearly different from the web-site and you can back up the key points with truly independent and reliable sources, there should be no problem. However, if you are indeed the subject of the article, that is going to be very difficult - this is one of the reasons that writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged as already indicated above by Diannaa. For what little it may be worth, I share your query about why this was created in the first place as in its current version it shows no evidence of notability and is a prime candidate for deletion. To prevent that happening you will need to find several reliable and independent sources that discuss the subject (you) - please see general notability guidelines for more information on notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:56, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Velella, thanks very much for clarification, it makes sense what you're saying that it shouldn't be me who updates information about myself. It is my first time here and for years I've been wanting to correct the false (outdated or not precise) information about me.

Supersonicsong, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Supersonicsong! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie Martin (Editor and producer) (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by EggOfReason were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julie Martin (Editor and producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Julie Martin (Editor and producer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 13:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Julie Martin

Hello, Supersonicsong. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julie Martin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Julie Martin (Editor and producer)

Hello, Supersonicsong. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julie Martin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]