User talk:Supernumerary
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Supernumerary has not edited Wikipedia since December 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Your suggestions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Peer review/The Last Waltz were really helpful. Thanks! What do you think of the article's chances of becoming a good article or featured article? Can you tell me more about the automatic peer review? Where I can I find it? Is it easy to use? — WiseKwai 17:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- And thanks yet again. I guess good article status is a realistic goal for now, though I think it could be a featured article. Regarding the use of images, do you think there are too many? Like with most bands, it is difficult to capture all the members in one frame when they are performing. Perhaps a screen capture from the soundstage scenes might work, and then all the individual shots of the Band could be removed. But I'm personally quite happy with the images as they stand now. If fair-use images are an inherent prohibition for featured-article status, how is it possible for other film and album articles to be designated as such, since fair-use images are the only kinds of images available? — WiseKwai 21:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: Priory Notable Alumni
[edit]It's not me. It's my freinds, I will ask them to stop. I recently erased about twleve students who put their names on there because they are in a club called "The Blessed Symposium". Lots of kids think its cool to have stuff with their name on the internet, which is silly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Prioryrebel20 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
Thanks
[edit]Thank you for your help in getting Black Book assessed as a Good article! - Ilse@ 23:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Peer review/Tears of the Black Tiger. I'm wishing I hadn't have put The Last Waltz forward before this one, which is more important to me. At any rate, once Tears and Last Waltz are put through the good article process, I'm going to back off and try to be more helpful to others going through the same process. On Tears of the Black Tiger, I've made substantial changes to the plot, the intro and the section dealing with the distribution, Miramax's purchase and the DVD release. Please have a look if you can and let me know what you think. Thanks again! — WiseKwai 16:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Lage Raho Munna Bhai
[edit]Done, thanks for the tip. Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 03:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for the barnstar! BTW, I'm beginning to think I should have listened to your suggestion about converting my refs into cite templates from peer review, as there is an apparent mess going on here. Alas. Dmoon1 00:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- You can post a message at FAC if you think it's necessary. I've tried to explain my actions both at FAC and the article's talk page, so perhaps other editors can see my intentions were honorable. No one has commented on it in a while, so I'm hoping my explanation has cleared things up. As for the "sole author" bit, it was a poor choice of words on my part and did not at all convey the message I wanted. I tend to stick my foot in my mouth at times.
- As to the nomination being held up, I think Raul promoted articles on the 14th, before this mess appeared, and they were all older nominations at the bottom of the page). Thanks again. I look forward to working with you in the future (I really like your work with Psycho (1960 film)). Dmoon1 03:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Talkheader
[edit]As I consider this important advice that needs to be on nearly all talk pages I have added that. As those guidelines are unhelpful it is either a matter of my uisng it most times or not using it all. I will raise the point on the talk page and will stop using it for the time being until I get it resolved. (Emperor 23:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC))
CineVoter
[edit]
Cbrown1023 00:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm fresh out of ideas and sources for expansion of this article (written by the author of Ginger Snaps). If you have any comments, they would be greatly appreciated. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 04:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I wanted to copyedit it later (not tonight), but if you have any suggestions that would be nice (and if you want to update its status that would be nice, too). CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 05:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your very thorough peer review. Your helpful suggestions, and your sharp eye, are very much appreciated!-Hal Raglan 02:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Re:Plot poll
[edit]Actually, you can edit it by your self, the text is transclude into the template and there is not casacading protection enabled. Just use Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Template Message. Cbrown1023 20:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:Films Newsletter
[edit]The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 06:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
CineVoter
[edit]PhantomS 22:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Some lists of films and a category for deletion
[edit]Hi, I wanted to let you know that some lists of films are up for deletion: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Categorization#Category:Lists of films with features in common. Hoverfish Talk 23:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Notability (films) nominated for deletion
[edit]Wikipedia:Notability (films) nominated for deletion
This is a courtesy notice: Wikipedia:Notability (films) has been nominated for deletion. --Kevin Murray 00:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films February Newsletter
[edit]The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikibreak
[edit]Have a good break and good luck with school. We'll keep sending you the newsletter to keep you up to date with what's going on. We hope to hear back from you again when you return. --Nehrams2020 05:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Hudson On The Moscow
[edit]I watched it about a year ago and have since forgotten the saxophone piece that Robin Williams practices all the time. It was kind of the "defining" song, if you will. Or, who the artist of the song? Or, you know, both. 71.97.179.93 22:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
CineVoter
[edit]--PhantomS 02:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Template talk
[edit]If you are back in time, your opinion would be most appreciated in Template talk:Film. Thanks. Hoverfish Talk 09:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
CineVoter
[edit]This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
March WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 talk 00:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Isle of Flowers
[edit]Do you know for sure if the copyrights for Isle of Flowers tolerates those full-featurette links under External links ? If so, can you link me with an appropriate statement?
May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 09:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 19:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 13:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films roll call
[edit]
An automatic notification by BrownBot 01:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
[edit]The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 00:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Psycho (1960 film) GAR notification
[edit]Psycho (1960 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
File:ShuyaandNorikotogether.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:ShuyaandNorikotogether.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ÷seresin 20:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
An RfC that you may be interested in...
[edit]As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
- This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jidlo1.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Jidlo1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jidlo2.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Jidlo2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!