User talk:Superghost987

Welcome

Hello Superghost987, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

JMS Old Al

Superghost987, good luck, and have fun. --Old Al (Talk) 22:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:57, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Veggies

Before we get into a revert war, I thought I'd ask why you are asserting that Veggie Tales is episodic. The videos have all been released as single entities and are not released in either "seasons" or "episodes". Although the recent Veggie Tales "TV" series is I guess theoretically episodic in the broadest terms, it simply runs previously released videos. Trying to see your point. Thanks - Ckruschke (talk) 18:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Ckruschke[reply]

Top Critics

The top critics you see on Rotten Tomatoes will be different than what I see. I found this out a few months ago when there was a disagreement between myself and another editor who kept changing the percentage figure to something higher. We found out that we were seeing different numbers and reviewers because it shows you certain reviewers based on where you are. So someone in the UK sees different Top Critics and ratings than someone in America or France. So basically policy is not to include Top Critics because it isn't an accurate figure. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is it alright if I just add the Top Critics rating without the review count? --Superghost987 (talk) 23:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No because the rating is based on those particular reviewers, so you put down 46% right? Well at the minute I see 59% from Top Critics for Sherlock Holmes. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for telling me! BTW, about that disagreement between yourself and another editor, can you show me by giving me the link? --Superghost987 (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_38#Rotten_Tomatoes_Top_critics

I love you now (no homo)

...because of this edit. Just felt like saying that. --Boycool (talk) 02:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PRProgRock sock

Blocked for 93 hours (that incorporates the 21 hours he didn't get blocked for the first time and the 72 hours I block for as the standard first use of an IP to evade a block. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Annoying-orange-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Annoying-orange-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]