User talk:Supercat9906

Welcome!

Hello, Supercat9906, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Supercat9906, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs

Hello, Supercat9906,

I don't mean to discourage you but participating in AFDs requires a deep understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, especially on the subject of different types of notability and reliable sourcing. It's not about your gut impression of an article's worthiness but also its potentail. Please take time to carefully evaluate articles and investigate their sources if you want to participate in deletion discussions.

If you have questions about deletion on Wikipedia or editing in general, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Supercat9906. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Asia Bonetto, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Supercat9906. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Supercat9906|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 22:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No i have no financial stake in this, i believe the person is notable so im improving the article so i can submit it for review, thank you! Supercat9906 (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Connor Dean moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Connor Dean. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GSS ^💬 14:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that you moved the draft to the main namespace after citing some sources. However, these sources unfortunately do not sufficiently establish notability. Therefore, the page has been moved back to the draft namespace. Please refrain from moving your page yourself; instead, submit it for review. Thank you. GSS ^💬 09:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Connor Dean (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Connor Dean and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 16:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Adnanjavidkhan1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shivangi1738. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 02:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]