User talk:Superbleachbrothers

Your edit summaries

I have noticed that many of your recent edit summaries are quite uncivil, such as these: [1], [2] and [3]. When reverting vandalism, please refrain from making personal attacks or appearing very angry for no reason. Thanks, timsdad ^(talk) 01:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About Twin Towers

When I said that 'that's better' I was referring to the edit I made, not the fact that the Twin Towers being gone are better. --76.238.5.64 (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for watching for vandalism

Just a quick word of thanks. I noticed you restored the warning I added to the user page for 66.211.238.79 (which, one minute later, was then removed again by someone at that same IP address). I restored it again and added a second warning. Thanks for watching out.... - gohlkus (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Wmgdisabledyoutube.png

Thanks for uploading File:Wmgdisabledyoutube.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Wmgdisabledyoutube.png

Thank you for uploading File:Wmgdisabledyoutube.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 17:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]