User talk:Superagente86

Welcome!

Hello, Superagente86, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Jorge Horacio Brito, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Excuse me, I am new herem but I changed an article by explaining that the article has fake and misleading information with references that don't exist anymore. I updated the article with accurate information. --Superagente86 (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, references still valid.-- Dewritech (talk) 18:12, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jorge Horacio Brito because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dewritech (talk) 18:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dewritech! If you see the Talk Section on Jorge Horacio Brito you will find out that the information that I have removed is fake, unsourced and biased. Please, let me keep it. Many thanks. --Superagente86 (talk) 18:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jorge Horacio Brito. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 18:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jorge Horacio Brito, you may be blocked from editing. Dewritech (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me Dewritech, but before you accuse me for vandalizing Wikipedia, I invite you to see what kind of changes I made on the article. I erased some fake, biased and unsourced content that should no be on Wikipedia. Please read the dicussion page at Jorge Horacio Brito in order to notice what I am doing. Many thanks. --Superagente86 (talk) 18:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jorge Horacio Brito. Dewritech (talk) 18:23, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me Dewritech, can you read what I wrote, please? This is like talking to a deaf person. I explained why I did those changes and you still threat me.

No removal of sourced content.-- Dewritech (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The sourced content is unreliable. How can you know that if I'm sure you know nothing about Argentina --Superagente86 (talk) 18:30, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those references look pretty sound to me. If you wish to push your position further, I would advise that you use the talk page, rather than try and win an edit war, especially if you are trying to remove sourced content. -- Orduin ^Discuss 20:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Orduin! If you see the talk page I gave a deep explanation about why this content should be removed. If you read the article you will see that Wikileas is use as a source and this is not very encyclopedic, isn't it? --Superagente86 (talk) 20:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Sherlock4000 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Superagente86 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey Berean Hunter! I have nothing to do with Sherlock4000 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Please I ask you to unblock me. Many thanks --Superagente86 (talk) 23:32, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The sockpuppetry is rather obvious, even without the technical evidence. Huon (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.