User talk:Super Bhaal

Welcome

Hello, Super Bhaal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions,or ask me or any other user.

I shall say it again.Welcome!Dimts 13:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Well, thank you. I appreciate the greeting. As far as useful contributions go, I'm afraid I don't have much to offer. I really only joined so I could fix what typographical and grammatical errors I could identify-- did it on WoWWiki, and I guess I'm gonna do it here. Again, thank you. --Super Bhaal 13:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Viking_falchion.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Viking_falchion.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alizee

Sorry if that was a legit edit. If a citation already exists, let me know, I'll add it back in with a citation so others won't make the same incorrect assumption that I did. TableManners 03:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It's "11" or something, a link to the WoWWiki page I linked to in the talk section. I was going to make a new citation when you said that, but decided "what's the point? I'll just make a new one". When I got around to doing that, I saw that there was already a citation and after toying around with the preview feature for a couple of minutes I just went, "the hell with it. I'll just point it out and someone else can take care of it". As well, the link to Blizzard might need fixing. --Super Bhaal 03:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I just changed it. Also, just in case you want to keep a few handy references around:

Wikipedia:Citation templates
Wikipedia:Footnotes, specifically, Wikipedia:Footnotes#Citing_a_footnote_more_than_once

Take care. TableManners 04:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I looked at the citation templates, ended up pulling my hair out, and left it to you guys to sort it out. Either way, thank you for the heads-up. As far as the credibility goes, I'm not too sure either but this ought to help.

[1]

Well, if it doesn't help it'll probably make you laugh. --Super Bhaal 03:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It made me laugh, and convinced me that it is true. But like I said, I am staying out of the debate. TableManners 04:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]