User talk:SuperSucker
(randomly assigned to my internet connections: mostly my home and mobile phone)
| Babel user information | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Users by language |
Dwelling through England for the past uninterrupted 3 years..
Myself.Hello, my name is [top secret], living in England since 2016.
these are all my contributions since registering the account (however, I did contribute without being logged in at Wikipedia: those contribs are mentioned above)
if you wonder why I sign my wikimedia uploads with a different username please read these 14 logs (in short, your signature doesn't have to be your actual username, because the history logs report it already)
The basics
[edit]New user: A lot to read.
Stats: 250 million views per day.
The prototype of the fundamental principles: When introduced, IAR was a personal and slightly hilarious policy.
The 5 fundamental policies: When introduced, the 5th pillar didn't exclude the former 4.
SuperSucker, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi SuperSucker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 7 August 2016 (UTC) |
??
[edit]Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia??--Moxy (talk) 11:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Looks as it has already been.But I'm here just to help contribute. SuperSucker (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- It looks as if you are spending most of your time here pulling other editors away from their work. If this continues I will have to block your account from editing per WP:IAR. ~Awilley (talk) 19:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- We3lcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperSucker (talk • contribs) 19:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- It looks as if you are spending most of your time here pulling other editors away from their work. If this continues I will have to block your account from editing per WP:IAR. ~Awilley (talk) 19:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Block evasion
[edit]Per your comment here, you were at the IPs that have been editing at Gender differences in suicide and Epidemiology of suicide.
Per this and this you are currently under a 1 week block, and you should honor that. That block was given to you, personally. It is good that you finally logged in, but your use of this account now is WP:BLOCKEVASION and I have removed your edits. When your block has expired please continue to use the logged in account. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Per the above. The original block was per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Edit war warning
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Gender differences in suicide shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jytdog (talk) 23:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 23:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)- Consider this block to also be for repeated use of IP addresses to edit the same pages as your account, in violation of WP:SCRUTINY. Courcelles (talk) 23:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Global rename unblock request (per my activity uploading images at commons.wikimedia.org and WP:UNCONF policy on confusing usernames)
[edit]
SuperSucker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Per recent developments (see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Rename_request_from_SuperSucker) I need to change my username only. I understand why you want me to request an unblock request, although I'm still concerned with Wikipedia's administrative fallacies: this for example, still remains somewhat nonsensical to me because I'm only needing the change of username. I hope you understand. SuperSucker (talk) 18:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You've been evading your block as an IP editor this month. You can try the standard offer, which requires you to avoid editing Wikipedia for six months. That means no block evasion as an IP editor, either. After that, we'll consider whether to unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Since someone at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Rename_request_from_SuperSucker (I'm not able to edit at AN/ANI since I'm blocked) raised the "old username usurpation" argument, may I point to this.
The user may wish to re-create the old account to prevent impersonation.
It clearly would be a preferred venue then, in case username usurpation is the issue, to take SuperSucker (either myself or an admin/steward) as soon as I'm renamed to Sundaymorning1999, or even better Xyz0123456789, or any casually decent, appropriate username (and obviously re-blocked at wikipedia). However, I don't mind the renaming being denied. It's ok. SuperSucker (talk) 14:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC) Note: by this username on suicide prevention topics, it's like if User:CandyShop (perfectly acceptable username) is very active on dental surgery topics, or worse, on childhood diseases, then wishing to change it to set down possible delusional interpretations.. ..(can't think of a better metaphor now). In simple words, username SuperSucker conveys some implied funny sexual connotation, while suicide prevention most likely shouldn't but seriousity. So it's uneasing. SuperSucker (talk) 19:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)