User talk:Sunshine1021

Hello, Sunshine1021, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article at Wikipedia:Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adam Bold. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. SharkxFanSJ (talk) 22:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Adam Bold

Thank you for submitting an article at Wikipedia:Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adam Bold. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Sunshine1021 (talk) 04:07, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been asked to provide secondary sources for this entry to show notability. Adam Bold frequently appears on national media outlets like Fox Business and CNBC, so I referenced The Mutual Fund Media Center where all of these interviews can be viewed. I also included a reference to Ernst & Young to cite his Entrepreneur of the Year Award and I referenced Random House to cite the book he wrote. I believe all of these to be secondary sources as Adam Bold did not publish these things on his own. If you can please tell me anything else I am missing I would appreciate it. This is my first Wikipedia posting so I am new to this, but I did look at other postings prior to writing this and believe my sources to be credible and in line with other articles I see on Wikipedia. Thank you. Sunshine1021 (talk) 04:07, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your work on Wikipedia. Examples of secondary sources would be: newspaper articles, peer-reviewed journal articles, books, magazine articles, etc. These can not be written by Adam Bold or his company. These sources should speak to his notability in his field. The Kansas City Business Journal article appears to fit the bill. With this additional source added, I'll go ahead and create the article. --SharkxFanSJ (talk) 06:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Mutual Fund Store

I have nominated The Mutual Fund Store, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mutual Fund Store. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Neu_tralle 11:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sunshine1021. You have new messages at Neutralle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Neu_tralle 14:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

The article you created The Mutual Fund Research Center appears to be mostly promotional with no good claim for separate notability per WP:N. I have redirected it. Polargeo (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a message on your talk page. The Mutual Fund Research Center® is a notable organization. In fact, it is registered with the United States. The information in the posting is factual and not promotional in any way. I hope you will reconsider and undo your redirect.Sunshine1021 (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you have posted on my talkpage I have replied there. Polargeo (talk) 09:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Mutual Fund Store (logo).png)

Thanks for uploading File:The Mutual Fund Store (logo).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Show-for-web.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Show-for-web.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Bold for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Bold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Bold until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brianhe (talk) 17:06, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Mutual Fund Store for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Mutual Fund Store is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mutual Fund Store (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brianhe (talk) 17:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]