User talk:Sunset551

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Belmont Abbey College, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 21:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Belmont Abbey College constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Catgut (talk) 21:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Belmont Abbey College. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Belmont Abbey College. Catgut (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Belmont Abbey College. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 21:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Belmont Abbey College article

It's kind of a common practice if you have some disagreement with a section of an article to bring the discussion to the talk page if someone doesn't like the change you've done. Repeatedly forcing your change on the article through repeated reversions isn't helpful. I've started a discussion on the talk page where it can be discussed. Chris M. (talk) 21:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)