User talk:Sunny singh9128

Welcome!

Hello, Sunny singh9128, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 08:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Shankar Dayal Singh

Hello Sunny, thanks that you considered the article on Shankar Dayal Singh. But, let me clarify that his father late Kamta Prasad Singh Kam was a very close and trusted aide of Sri Shrkrishna Sinha and not Sri Anugrah Narayan Singh. In fact, Anugrah babu considered him a thorn in the political career of his dear son - Chhote Saheb. Parijat.delhi (talk) 03:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Sunny singh9128. This edit that you made to the article Sushil Kumar Modi accidentally introduced a redirect into the article – you probably clicked an editing shortcut by mistake while changing the page. Don't worry, I've removed the redirect tag, but just remember to make full use of the "Show preview" and "Show changes" buttons when you edit, to make sure that you haven't added or removed anything you didn't intend to. Thanks! haz (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:BiharVibhuti.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:BiharVibhuti.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 13:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Biharkesari.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Biharkesari.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sherool (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Snsinha.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Snsinha.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sherool (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nksingh.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nksingh.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sherool (talk) 20:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nikhilkumar.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nikhilkumar.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sherool (talk) 20:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mr Nikhil Kumar.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mr Nikhil Kumar.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 20:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi Narayan Singh

This article was deleted as a hoax, as not a single one of the links refer to the named individual (I believe his purported father and grandfather-in-law are the subject of many of the linked pages), and there is no mention of this individual in lists of Bihar politicians. Of the supposed sources:

1. Leaders pay PAYS TRIBUTE TO FORMER CM S N SINHA is an article remembering Satyendra Narayan Singh on what would have been his 92nd birthday with no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh

2. S N Sinha anniversary is the exact same link as Reference 1 above (and obviously contains no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh)

3. First Bihar Deputy CM cum Finance Minister;Dr. A N Sinha is a non-existent page.

4. A gentleman among politicians:Anugrah babu-one of makers of Bihar is an obituary for Satyendra Narain Sinha who died at age 87 with no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh

5. Great freedom Fighters is a photograph of Anugrah Narayan Sinha with no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh

6. JP movement Bihar is a short article on the JP movement with no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh

7. Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad is a link to the front page of the ABVP website with no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh

8. ABVP is the exact same link as Reference 7 above (and obviously contains no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh)

9. 1975 JP movement Bihar is the exact same link as Reference 6 above (and obviously contains no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh)

10. PM condoles passing away of Satyendra Narayan Sinha is an obituary for S.N. Sinha with no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh

11. National Advisory committee of Ministry of external affairs is a biography of Vedprakash P. Goyal with no mention of Lakshmi Narayan Singh

It is very plain to see that this individual is completely fictitious. Recreation of this article again (unless you're able to provide sources which actually confirm--without any doubt--the existence of the individual along with his notability) will result in a permanent ban from editing on Wikipedia. Lexicon (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr Nikhil Kumar Singh.jpg

I noticed that you uploaded File:Mr Nikhil Kumar Singh.jpg after File:Mr Nikhil Kumar.jpg was marked as being without evidence of proper permission. I have deleted the duplicate under CSD:F1 and ask that you kindly refrain from attempting to circumvent Wikipedia's copyright policies in this manner. Lexicon (talk) 19:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the request above you have again uploaded a duplicate image as File:Nikhil.jpg which has been deleted as a duplicated. Please refrain from uploading the same problem images and perhaps provide evidence of permission. You will be blocked from editing if you continue to circumvent Wikipedia's copyright policies. MilborneOne (talk) 22:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nikhil Kumar.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nikhil Kumar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:44, 26 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 22:44, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are similar problems with all of the images that you have uploaded [1]. Images must have detailed source information (not just "website"), and evidence that they are released under the claimed free licenses; merely publishing an image on the web does not in itself make an image free. --dave pape (talk) 02:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you from editing for a period of two weeks for continuing to upload images from websites without explaining, after repeated requests, how they qualify for the Creative Commons or other licences you are attributing to them. When your block expires I encourage you to continue to edit with Wikipedia's copyright policies in mind. Lexicon (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sunny singh9128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been a bonafide contributor to wikipedia and it has been mine endeavour to work towards providing updated authentic information to the users;in order to illustrate the biographical account of a person holding a constitutional office;the image has been taken from the official website released in public domain;while the other images are from historic documents preserved by the archive department and is absolutely justified to be used in order to provide information to people about our historical illumanaries,eminent statesman and prominent citizens of society.Sir,i would reitrate my stand that the administrator may guide me regarding terms of usagae if images and unblock me with immediate effect;so that i can keep updating and contributing articles of social and academic importance.I furthur assure you that,taking cue from the instructions provided;i shall adhere to the Wikipedia's copyright policies.

Decline reason:

I'm not sure from this that you understand exactly what you're blocked for, which is specifically providing misleading copyright information. Checking on what Commons has on Indian copyright law, I see that images older than 60 years are generally PD. OK, that's great but the source info you provided doesn't help us in that regard. Further (and this is more serious), you uploaded images you clearly did not create under CC or GFDL licensing. The source pages you provided neither indicate that you own the copyright to those images or that they were posted under such licenses. For an introduction to our copyright policies, see here. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sunny singh9128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir,i would assure you that i have gone through the instructions carefully and that i would adhere to the Wikipedia's copyright policies;however some of the images like BiharVibhuti.jpg(Dated Feb 1946) & Satyendra narayan sinha.jpg(year 1948) are eligible to enter the public domain,According to The Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (Chapter V Section 25), all photographs and sound recordings enter the public domain after sixty years counted from the beginning of the following calendar year (ie. as of November 2009, prior to 1 January 1949) after they were first published. Since both the pictures are of before 1949 , the Image is in the Public domain.It is therefore requested;to reconsider the deletion tag applied with the images as they are suitably qualified to be released in public domain.

Decline reason:

That may all be true, but you're side-stepping the more serious question Daniel Case raised at the end of his reply. You have uploaded images to which you clearly do not own the copyright. This issue must also be addressed before you are unblocked. TN X Man 12:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

While we are asked to Wikipedia:Assume good faith, given that you previously posted and reposted a hoax article, you must forgive us for our skepticism. When adding images, you must be willing to cite your sources in detail, and you have still failed to do so here. Dekimasuよ! 12:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bihar_Kesari_Sri_Babu_&_Bihar_Vibhuti_Anugrah_Babu.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bihar_Kesari_Sri_Babu_&_Bihar_Vibhuti_Anugrah_Babu.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 02:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:1917anugrah.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:1917anugrah.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:1917anugrah.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:1917anugrah.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ansiss.org/AboutUs.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies

Hello. Concerning your contribution, A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ansiss.org/AboutUs.aspx. As a copyright violation, A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:1917anugrah.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:1917anugrah.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While you have specified a source, the source is simply a mirror of Wikipedia. You need to provide the authentic, original source. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

University of Patna

Hi, I'm afraid that I have had to revert your recent edits on the University of Patna article. You duplicated wikilinks when usually a term is linked to only once, at the first occurrence of it in the article. You also duplicated a name already in the list. If in doing this I have removed something inadvertently then please feel free to reinsert that part, but not the links or the person. I couldn't spot anything else in your edit but I am not infallible by any means! Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 20:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article University of Patna, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it is not enough just to say that the person attended the university. The article for the person needs to indicate this and it needs to be cited to a reliable source. Furthermore, Wikipedia discourages lists - which tend to keep growing - and this list is long enough, I feel. And, lastly, is this person a relative of yours? - Sitush (talk) 09:20, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:SatyendraNarainSingh.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:SatyendraNarainSingh.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:08, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reverted your deletion of the CSD tag on the image because your changes did not address the issues which it raised. You have had this problem before, as evidence by the many warnings and advisory comments listed here on your talk page. You may want to review them in order to address the issue correctly. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 20:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,with regards to the issues raised;let me assure you that the problems associated with previous uploads have been genuinely sorted out.In India;under constitutional provisions;all images are said to be available in free public domain after a lapse of specific years(60 years);so every image dating back before 1951 is in free public domain and free from any copyright what so ever! They can be used both for educative and illustrative purposes.I have been a bonafide member of the Wikipedia fraternity for the last half a decade and contributed under the prescribed rules and standards.Any problems;whether coming out of lack of information or ignorance of certain norms have always been fixed and responded to at the earliest.Sir, the file SatyendraNarainSingh.jpg is a picture taken from a portrait and has never been published ever before but exclusively uploaded for Wikipedia for educative purpose.The person taken into account is a premier public figure from Indian state of Bihar who has been an eminent nationalist and also served as the provincial head of state(CM,Bihar).There is no legal bonding on the image whatso ever;given that the image is readily available to be used in educative and news articles.Please assist me;how come this issue can be addressed so that Wikipedia article is not deprived of a very informative pictorial reference.

Hi, it seems that you didn't sort all the issues out because some of the images were deleted. Can you prove that the original of this particular image was dated before 1951? Where did it come from? Don't say that you took a photo of it as that is insufficient - where was the original? I really don't care who or what it is a picture of, just whether or not it is correctly licensed and attributed here. At present it seems not to be, just as with your earlier efforts. - Sitush (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify (as I notice that this applies to some other images that you have uploaded), taking a photograph of a picture and then uploading that photograph does not make it your own work etc. - Sitush (talk) 14:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,though i understand the points raised by you.Please answer some of my queries.Yes,the images were deleted because even i was ignorant of the fact about the right license to be used with the image.It was only after being asked by Wikipedia administrators;i read the entire rules and knew that those images were already in free public domain(much older than 60 years).Those images are absolutely in free public domain and can be used everywhere and anytime over the world for any article,news or schloraly purposes.There is no issue of any copyright at all! Since they are already in public domain.Please google it or use any verifiable authentic source and you will certainly known that the Gandhi's movement in India begun in 1917; and that Dr Rajendra Prasad & Dr AN Sinha went there with him in 1917(Thats 94 years before!).Seccondly, it will be very kind of you if you can help me establish the problem related with the image SatyendraNarainSingh.JPG.The image is exclusively for educative purpose.

Please clarify;what additional information is required to verify the authenticity of the image.If this image doesnot qualify for Wikipedia article;i will certainly introduce verifiable content.

(edit conflict) You are basically repeating yourself now. How old is he in the picture? From what publication did you take the photograph? Forget what happened 94 years ago - it is irrelevant. I've already asked you this. - Sitush (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This picture of Mr SN Singh dates back to 1987;he was 70 years old then.It has never been published by any publication since it is taken from the portatrit.There is no copyright issue with it.Since, a valid licence has to be used.let me provide one under permitted rules.

Who did the portrait? Please do not amend the license until this is sorted here as it merely creates more work. - Sitush (talk) 14:57, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the picture,File:ShivsagarRamgoolamStatueInPatna.JPG;it is also a picture of a statue taken by someone and scanned and thereafter released in the public domain.No questions have been raised about its copyrights or the origin.Though the statue is said to be in Patna;how can this be authentified that it actually exists there only and that the uploader has the rights to relase the picture on Wikipedia?Who has created the statue and no queries have been raised about the publication agency too! Sir,going by the established practices i have endeavoured to put forward the picture File:SatyendraNarainSingh.jpg;if it qualifies to be deleted then why not the former one? though understandbly;there seems to be a conflict of interest here as different licenses have been used in the two.But the basic essence remains the same! Both have been clicked from a source (former a statue & latter one from a portrait).So,it is better to use the right licensing attributed with the image.I will go by what ever instructed by the Wkipedia administrators.Let it be sorted out or another version of the image can be uploaded with a proper license.Thank You

You are still avoiding my question. As for your own question, well, see other stuff exists - just because something else is here doesn't mean that your picture should be. Each item has to be taken on its own merits. I have reverted your license change as it is clearly incorrect: by your own admission, this is at least a derivative work. - Sitush (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,i am not justifying anything nor trying to avoid the issues raised! further,it was a bonafide case of misintrepretation which led to the inclusion of wrong licensing.However;it is indeed true that each item has its own merits and similar ones have to be dealt with same standards and regulations.There can not be different regulations for items qualifying with the same issues.Also,i am happy that the administrator has candidly admitted that everything has to be taken on its own merit;that itself amounts to the fact that the inclusion of such a picture is itself not incorrect but the choice of license was!Anyways! thank you so much for pointing out the shortcomings.Will make sure that proper guidelines are strictly adhered to in future edits

Sorry, but you have not answered my queries. The file will be deleted unless this is resolved. So, who did the 1987 portrait? I know that you did not because you have said that you took a photo of the portrait. This raises my other question: where is the portrait that you took a photo of? - Sitush (talk) 16:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I am not an administrator and, as I said earlier, right now my interest is in this image & not any other. Other images that should not be here might exist, but that is not an excuse for allowing this one to exist. I'm not sure if you are familiar with the English saying "two wrongs do not make a right", but that is the situation. - Sitush (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right sir, with regards to the first query.The portrait hangs in "Gandhi Sangrahalaya"(A Public Museum); a place where pictures,portraits,documents & other historic stuff is on display for general public.Everyone is allowed to click pictures;since the items are in public domain and are exhibited for educative purpose for everyone sans any regulation.Agreed!.there cannot be two ways of eating the same pie!.While the same cannot be said about pictures taken from other public installations!(Statues or buildings)If other pictures continue to exist even when they too amount to same regulations;let this one be removed under the discretion of the wiki authorities.

Thanks for the information. Do you understand what the term "public domain" means in the context of copyright? Just because something can be seen by the public does not mean that it is in the public domain, otherwise no book could be copyrighted etc. I'll try to find a website for the museum in order to check their rules (this is not intended to suggest that you are telling untruths, so please do not take offence). There are several museums with this names - which one is it? Patna? Mumbai? Or where? - Sitush (talk) 18:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I well aware of the terminology "Public Domain" sir!.It is not that everything that is exhibited accounts to be in public state.Thats why i referred to the image File:ShivsagarRamgoolamStatueInPatna.JPG.The picture being discussed here hangs in Gandhi Sangrahalaya Patna.Where pictures of all former Bihar CM's hangs apart from historic images belonging to Mahatama Gandhi and his associates.The official website only lists the images associated with M K Gandhi & his collegues and not of former CM's since it is customary in many of state departments & ministerial offices to have portraits of former heads of states!

Thanks, again. The Patna museum's website (including the photo galleries) are copyrighted. I do understand that the photo you have uploaded is not on the website, and there is no problem with it not being there. However, as a "portrait" taken in 1987 and then photographed by yourself (which makes it a derivative work), there is no evidence that Wikipedia has permission to use it. The website mentions nothing about photography being allowed, or what can be done with any photos taken; nor does it mention anything about what you call "educative purpose" (although, of course, most museums are educational).

I think that you are going to have to ask the museum to send permission to Wikipedia. Sorry, but that is how I see it. However, I'll ask someone else to read through the conversation we've had and see what they say. I might be wrong! - Sitush (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You mention File:ShivsagarRamgoolamStatueInPatna.JPG. The photographer in that case was able to release his photograph into the public domain because the underlying work is a sculpture on public display in a country (India) which has freedom of panorama.

In your case, however, the underlying work is a flat photograph, and freedom of panorama does not apply to flat photographs. Therefore the fact that a print of the original photograph is on public display does not suspend the original photographer’s copyright. Indian copyright lasts for 60 years after publication; so unless it was published before 1951, or unless the original photographer explicitly released the photograph into the public domain, the original photograph is still under copyright. —teb728 t c 22:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,While i understand the cycle of events here.let me clarify about a basic fundamental notion here! As far as the freedom of panorama is being referred to;a fact has to be taken into account that in India not only a sculpture alone but also a portrait or a picture put up on a public display has the right to be used for above said purposes.If the image File:ShivsagarRamgoolamStatueInPatna.JPG could be released by the photographer in public domain since it is on public display;why not the Image being referred to here! It has also been put up on public display in India! Also if under circumstances(as being made out here)it is being labelled as flat photograph;then the latter one is also a flat photograph and should also be omitted!!There cannot be individualistic treatment of similar entities under same conditions!

You are mistaken; see Commons:Freedom of Panorama#India. In India freedom of panorama “does not include copies of paintings, drawings, or photographs.” —teb728 t c 11:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mr S N Sinha.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mr S N Sinha.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sitush (talk) 20:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nikhil Kumar.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Nikhil Kumar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SatyendraNarayanSinha.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SatyendraNarayanSinha.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copyright/permission is vague: other uploads by this editor use a wording that wld make this a copyvio as not certain to be a govt source

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sitush (talk) 21:24, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to University of Patna appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 13:54, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At first place; How can one establish the authenticity of a genuine fact if there is no proper digitisation of the report or university prospectous available online that carries specific names of its prominent alumni!We are well aware that former Governor S K Sinha was an alumni of the Patna University.Please search about it on any available searchengine on earth or through any possible means that you consider 'neutral' on internet.(Even Check out the Bio-profile on J& K website and Assam Website)where he served as Governor or even go through any verifiable link page or news! The obvious fact is there! Mr S K Sinha is a former alumni of Patna University.Please check it yourself else it would only amount to a bonafide case of mistaken conceptualisation about my edits if you doubt the neutrality of this inclusion and would amount to a personal Vendetta!

Please check the following links:

http://www.winentrance.com/general_knowledge/lt-gen-s-k-sinha.html

http://www.patnadaily.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3028:pu-graduation-ceremony-girl-students-fair-better&catid=56:more-news&Itemid=236

The official website of J & K Governor::

http://jkrajbhawan.nic.in/His%20Excellency/present11.htm

You can clearly check it yourself and conclude that he was indeed an alumnus of the university.Hope this will clarify your doubts and clean the air of uncertainity which has created such a veil that you consider everything a farce!

The problem was neutrality, as the message says. A person's name was already there, and to that you added the word "eminent" - this is a WP:peacock term and also introduced undue weight in that there was a subliminal suggestion that the other names in the list were not eminent. You also added the word "prominent", which is another peacock term in the context that you used it. There is a general issue about lists in these articles as they are discouraged by WP:UNIGUIDE, but the point that caused the reversion on this occasion was neutrality. Really, you are falling into an awful lot of minor problems simply because you either have not read or do not understand the basic policies and guidelines here. This is despite several people trying to tell you. It was because you continued to ignore such issues that you were blocked some time ago. It may happen again, unfortunately, unless you can get to grips with what you are being advised regarding content etc. If you do not understand then feel free to ask. This is not a vendetta & I am not following you around - if you check the history for the University of PAtna article then you will see that I have been editing that for quite some time and indeed performed a substantial merge into it of other articles, with the support of an administrator. - Sitush (talk) 21:23, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand what is being conveyed here and can certainly assure that i will upheld the ethics & guidelines as prescribed by the organisation.Secondly, intellectuals,top government functionaries or constitutional chiefs & well known national social personalties are indeed regarded as 'eminent' in any part of the world;though i concede it could have been intrepeted the other way! The Governor of a state(Like there is a Governor for a province in US or its equivalent in a federal structure)does amounts to be considered as a personality of eminence.Also,let me put forward this candid admission that initially i was not completely aware of the guidelines regarding image usage & licensing and about copyright authentification;this led to such a critical juncture where i was put under temporary blockage for violation of norms.Thereafter,i have educated myself about it and i assure you i will certainly take your instructions in the best of spirits and i am looking forward towards your guidance in helping me clear my queries so that i can contribute both accurately and freely.Thanks

Actually, you got blocked after people made you aware ... and then you did the same thing again very recently, which led to another set of images being deleted. As for "eminent", well, I guarantee you that it is not acceptable here and indeed I have doubts that it is not a "worldwide" thing. For example, it is not frequently used in the UK, even though the person may indeed be eminent. I do suggest that you go back and read WP:peacock. - Sitush (talk) 19:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bihar Portal

Hello sunny,this is regarding the edits you made on the Portal:Bihar,biography section. The editing is quite complex over Bihar portal,specially for new users.I observed that you deleted one of the biography to add another,i also observed that you did this because you were not able to add new biography w/o deleting current one. I have made re-edits,now both old and new biography is present.In future before making any edit on Bihar Portal,Kindly discuss it on Discussion page. Thank you.^^Maverick.Mohit^^ 15:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maverick.Mohit (talk • contribs) [reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:First Cabinet of independent Bihar

Template:First Cabinet of independent Bihar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 19:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. StarM 18:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Possibly unfree File:AnugrahNarayanSinha.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AnugrahNarayanSinha.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mr.Karpoori Thakur with Shri Satyendra Narayan Sinha n Shri Raj Narain.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mr.Karpoori Thakur with Shri Satyendra Narayan Sinha n Shri Raj Narain.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 18:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 18:41, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,

how can I even appeal if I am unable to edit the talk page itself & my IP address is blocked  too! This is sheer injustice  & a blatant  curtailment  of free expression!  As far the imposed  ban is concerned  it  is  unsubstantiated  & for unbelievable  reason! I humbly appeal  for a review!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sunny singh9128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had not committed any copyrights violation whatsoever as argued by learned admin, first & foremost I have duly uploaded an image created by my late family member which i am in possession of , the only bona-fide mistake was that it should have been licensed under PD-heirs, but for an inadvertently entered license template, why the entire file was deleted on the pretext of copyright? Was it discussed at open forum or by team of admins & checked for copyrights? It should have been discussed for copyright issues but instead a unilateral decision was made. If I am the sole owner of images by virtue of the above ground & also willing to update the appropriate license, how come this amounts to any violation? Secondly, please provide any veritable proof or link that contradicts this fact and questions copyrights. This hard and fast rule without genuine analysis will lead to considerable detrimental effect on good edits & inflict collateral damage. Also, I had to again upload the image since despite providing sufficient ground, any response on undeletion was delayed! Infact another admin had also conceded that it could be undeleted and licensed with suitable template. What had happened to me 2-3 years back does not make any sense today since both the context and issue is different, if such prejudiced action prevails, wikimedia contributors are going to suffer,let me ask you, have you not conducted errors in past? Will you be unilaterally banned without proper discussion? Anyways, I know I will not be unblocked even temporarily because of Ego issue of admin.I can provide ,links of files where hundreds of similar such images have been kept by admins because either they were considered PD or author creation, that's too even without authors providing any proof for date of publication or ownership , anyways, thanks Sunny_singh9128 223.176.13.249 (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Totally justified block, especially considering your socking. Max Semenik (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've also used multiple accounts to further the same, claiming images as PD, then changing to self, then changing to heirs etc: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunny singh9128‎. —SpacemanSpiff 05:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is utterly insane & hilarious , if two people or a group of people are editing & contributing to a common or similar page or interest , will they be considered sockpuppets & banned? I understand over the years, there could be interlinked contributions but does that mean Implying unsubstantiated notion without proper analysis?

also, if any contributions are backed by veritable evidence what injustice it will do? I had made edits because I found similar such issues and the MOST IMPORTANT thing here is, is there any proof that establishes that my uploaded image violates copyrights?

My request should be reviewed by another neutral administrators and a discussion should be allowed.

Let me guarantee that if I am at fault, I will take full responsibility & wouldn't repeat it ever again, even for a single edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.176.15.5 (talk) 05:52, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sunny singh9128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason-I will ensure full compliance of suggestions & wouldn't repeat any inadvertently conducted error ever again, even for a single edit,request to be temporarily unblocked for few hours and allowed to continue to submit legitimate representation appeal with evidence against the block106.196.128.88 (talk) 16:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You must be signed in to request unblock, so we know who it is making the request. Peridon (talk) 16:47, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-free rationale for File:Bihar Kesari Sri Babu & Bihar Vibhuti Anugrah Babu.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bihar Kesari Sri Babu & Bihar Vibhuti Anugrah Babu.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SatyendraNarayanSinhawithAnugrahBabu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SatyendraNarayanSinhawithAnugrahBabu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]