User talk:Sunlight14

Welcome!

Hello, Sunlight14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Amen (band of Peru), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Reconsider ! 12:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amen (band of Peru)

A tag has been placed on Amen (band of Peru) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Reconsider ! 12:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. JNW (talk) 13:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Amen (band of Peru). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You can't simply remove templates you don't agree with. OlYeller^Talktome 15:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Amén

I have nominated Amén, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amén. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. GregJackP (talk) 00:57, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Libre(álbum)

A tag has been placed on Libre(álbum) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 23:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide some reliable third party sources to verify the notability of the band? The reason it's up for deletion is because it doesn't meet the notability criteria of WP:BAND. -Reconsider ! 01:33, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you! --Sunlight14 (talk) 12:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amén

Since you seem fairly new to the encyclopedia, I thought I would help by explaining the problem with this article. To be included, you need to prove that this article meets the notability criteria for musical groups - that is, that the band is important enough to deserve an article. You cannot simply say it is, please read the criteria and make sure you fulfil at least one of the points. You also need to prove that the band is verifiable, and that you can cite the source for you information to a reliable source. If you read through these policies and make sure that the article meets them, it will go along way to preventing deletion. Even if the article is deleted, I hope you will not let it put you off Wikipedia. Hope this helped! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 12:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transformation

Ok thank you, I ll do it! --Sunlight14 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunlight14 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. JD554 (talk) 11:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week. for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 15:55, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sunlight14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Will not sock again!I need help, give me a chance.All I want is to create one article (Amen (band of Peru)) which I really improved since the 27 may! I put a lot of reference and also changed other things. Who can help me?

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked if your sole intent is to continue to reintroduce an article about a non-notable band. You would think that you are involved in the band with the way you're pushing this so hard. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:17, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.