User talk:Sunit Roy

May 2018

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Kusum Dola— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 14:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning! for derogatory remarks and repeated regressive editing

Listen Ass*** aka Sumit Kumar Roy , it doesn't matter who you are or where from you belong, if you post regressive content repeatedly, as you always do in your edits you will have to face the consequences - edit warring and subsequent revertion of your edits. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia where anyone can contribute, it doesn't matter if he/she isfrom the production house or not (as you appear to claim). BUT WHENEVER SOMEONE EDITS AN ARTICLE ON WIKIPEDIA, HE WILL HAVE TO ABIDE BY WIKIPEDIA'S RULES AND STANDARDS. Who the hell are you to not abide by the set rulrs while writing and thus doing promotion on wokipedia. Also, do you even know MOS:TV, when you don't know you should learn it's principles first then contribute to wikipedia. Removal of 7 RELIABLE REFERENCES, USE OF "-->" ARROWS, DELETING IMPORTANT PARTS OF PLOT, FOOLISH REFERENCE OF LEADS AS "MALE"/"FEMALE", PERSISTENT DISRUPTIVE EDITING! AND REPOSTING REGRESSIVE CONTENT.- thes are some examples of your job. So get in your thick skull Mr. Production House, if you want to edit as per your ridiculous and abstract whim, launch your own site and then write there whatever you want to. But, this sort of writing style won't be tolerated by us experienced users.

Also you launched a personal attack on me as I did [YOU].Users who insist on a confrontational style marked by personal attacks are likely to become involved in the dispute resolution process, and may face serious consequences through arbitration. By User:103.249.5.225

This is Sumit Kumar Roy, from the Production House. whoever you are Mr. Abir_susnigdha, you are suggested to stay away from this page & let the professional edit the article accordingly. This is not a fan page. so kindly do not edit by your own choice. or else Magic Moment Pro House will be compelled to take action against your IP. -Sumit Kumar Roy, 20:50 IST.

Who are you to suggest an editor to not edit on wikipedia. And by the way who is the profession referred to here, has wikipedia hired you to take the sole responsibility of editing article- Kusum Dola??? If you can't edit as wikipedia's quality standrds your edits will be reverted anyways. Repeated vandalism will lead to block of your account and this thing has nothing to do with the production house as wikipedia is not owned by the pro house, if the pro house has really hired Sumit Roy to edit the article let them launch the article on their own website otherwise Sumit Roy must obey Wikipedia's rules and guidelines. Don't think you can edit by your own sweet will. From User:103.249.5.225 9:15 UTC.

Conflict of interest, attempts to take ownership of articles, etc.

Hi there, per these edits, [1][2][3][4] it's pretty obvious that you have a conflict of interest at Kusum Dola, and I need to make a few things very clear to you:

Having a conflict of interest is a serious ethical concern. I'm sure you know what ethics are. People with conflicts of interest have extraordinary difficulty writing objectively about subjects they are connected to, and tend to want to control that content, and as such, people with conflicts of interest are strongly discouraged from editing subjects they are closely affiliated with.
Neither you nor the company you work for has ownership of any article at Wikipedia, and neither you nor your company get to dictate what sort of content is acceptable for inclusion at Wikipedia. This is a community project, and we already have well-established community preferences for TV article content. See MOS:TV. If you want to maintain full control of what sort of content is being published about the TV series, by all means, pay money to establish a production website and print whatever you want over there. Wikipedia content belongs to the community.
Wikipedia is not a forum for promotion or marketing.
If any change you have made is reverted in good faith by another editor with a clear reason, your recourse is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for inclusion of the content you prefer. We do not tolerate edit-warring of any sort.
We also do not tolerate personal attacks, like this. Calling someone an asshole is now how we maintain a constructive community project. Keep a cool head. If you lob any more personal attacks, I'll interrupt your editing privileges.
We do not tolerate legal threats. If you make another legal threat like the one you made here, I will interrupt your editing privileges.

Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Sunit Roy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Kusum Dola, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sunit Roy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sunit Roy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 05:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing and conflict of interest part 2

Sunit, you are again urged to declare your paid editing status, (See instructions in the comments above) and another reminder that you have a clear conflict of interest, and you should not be editing articles you are entwined with, like Kusum Dola. Wikipedia is not an extension of Star Jalsha, and we are not subject to renovations by its staff, nor are we required to host whatever content you prefer. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:27, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Your behavior seems to suggest that you believe you have ownership of Kusum Dola. You do not, as I've explained to you twice. In these edits, you inexplicably remove a cleanup template without fixing the myriad grammar and syntax issues, and you also pointlessly restored a myriad of ampersands, which are not used in professional English prose, and which contravene our Manual of Style, specifically MOS:AMP. Your edits also restore interpretive content about the plot being "neatly-woven". That's an opinion, and that doesn't belong there. The content is also very vague about how the characters become intertwined, and the entire sentence reads like promotional copy and is entirely unnecessary. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia, rather, you are here to govern the content that appears at Kusum Dola. Given your significant conflict of interest, which is a big ethical problem, I don't think you have the capacity to edit that article objectively. You seem fixated on this version of the plot summary, which is laden with grammar errors and Manual of Style violations, yet you keep submitting it over and over again, undoing other editors' attempts to improve it. Anyway, I don't have the sense that you're here to constructively build an encyclopedia in a collaborative environment, so your editing privileges have been revoked until you can change that behavior.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:13, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]