User talk:SunilSonar9

Welcome!

Hello, SunilSonar9, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Rodzina Technology Pvt. Ltd., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 18:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rodzina Technology Pvt. Ltd.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rodzina Technology Pvt. Ltd., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.rodzinatechnology.com/index.php/about/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 18:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SunilSonar9. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Rodzina Technology Pvt. Ltd., you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, SunilSonar9. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:Rodzina Technology Pvt. Ltd. has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources. This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Company about pages are, by nature, promotional. Encyclopedia writing means summarizing what reliable sources unconnected with the subject say. It does not mean copy-pasting corporate promo-tripe. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Victoria's Secret Fashion Show, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Review Team,

I am writing to appeal the lock on my Wikipedia account, username SunilSonar9. I understand that my account was locked due to a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I deeply regret any actions or edits I made that may have caused this violation.

I am a passionate contributor to the Wikipedia community and have always strived to maintain the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in my edits. However, I acknowledge that I may have made a mistake, and I am willing to take full responsibility for any errors or oversights that may have occurred.

I would like to request that my account be unlocked so that I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia in a positive and constructive manner. I assure you that I have learned from my mistakes and will make every effort to comply with all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in the future.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the opportunity to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

Sincerely, SunilSonar9 SunilSonar9 (talk) 12:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at A Modest Proposal. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Review Team,

I am writing to appeal the lock on my Wikipedia account, username SunilSonar9. I understand that my account was locked due to a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I deeply regret any actions or edits I made that may have caused this violation.

I am a passionate contributor to the Wikipedia community and have always strived to maintain the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in my edits. However, I acknowledge that I may have made a mistake, and I am willing to take full responsibility for any errors or oversights that may have occurred.

I would like to request that my account be unlocked so that I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia in a positive and constructive manner. I assure you that I have learned from my mistakes and will make every effort to comply with all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in the future.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the opportunity to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

Sincerely, SunilSonar9 SunilSonar9 (talk) 12:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Candice Swanepoel. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Review Team,

I am writing to appeal the lock on my Wikipedia account, username SunilSonar9. I understand that my account was locked due to a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I deeply regret any actions or edits I made that may have caused this violation.

I am a passionate contributor to the Wikipedia community and have always strived to maintain the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in my edits. However, I acknowledge that I may have made a mistake, and I am willing to take full responsibility for any errors or oversights that may have occurred.

I would like to request that my account be unlocked so that I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia in a positive and constructive manner. I assure you that I have learned from my mistakes and will make every effort to comply with all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in the future.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the opportunity to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

Sincerely, SunilSonar9 SunilSonar9 (talk) 12:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SunilSonar9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have added real information with source link SunilSonar9 (talk) 04:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, that's one way to look at it ... Most people will look at what you did and call it spamming. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SunilSonar9 (talk) 04:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

when my block has expired

block has expired.when my block has expired SunilSonar9 (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]