User talk:Sungpeshwe9

December 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Prithviraj Chauhan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 05:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gaur Rajput without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Heba Aisha (talk) 08:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Udai Singh I. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. utcursch | talk 15:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Sungpeshwe9. [1] Drmies (talk) 16:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Amar Singh Rathore, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This edit [2] Heba Aisha (talk) 17:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prithviraj Chauhan Page

Hello Sungpeshwe9 i want to tell you that recently u was in edit conflict on Prithviraj Page about Rajput identity but i want to inform u that U should add sources From Secondary Sources instead of Primary work More like u Should Add a Source and use on Talk Page which mention like Prithviraj Vijay or Contemparary Text present about Rajput Warriors or Rajput valour or Present Chauhans or Prithviraj as Rajput Something like this Not Original Work. I suggest u a book by Kaushik Roy which suggest that Prithviraj Vijay a Contemparary Text present us about Rajput Warriors u can use that on talk page instead of Original Search of Al Masudi.Thanks 2401:4900:40A8:53F:7F8B:752F:4F1C:9FE4 (talk) 06:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you i will look into it Sungpeshwe9 (talk) 06:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kaushik Roy (2020-11-04). Military Thought of Asia: From the Bronze Age to the Information Age. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-21079-8.

This work of Kaushik Roy states that Prithviraj Vijay present Chamans as Rajputs and Present about Rajput warriors it cant be used by U if u like.

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=PnBMFaGMabYC&q=Rajput#v=snippet&q=Rajput&f=false from page 111 to 124

U can quote this work of Romila Thapar too also which mentions about Prithviraj vijay which present about Rajput Valour see also call them Rajput epics.2401:4900:40A8:53F:7F8B:752F:4F1C:9FE4 (talk) 06:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Zcyho16xzWEC&q=Rajput#v=snippet&q=Rajput&f=false

U can quote this work of Chattopadhaya too if u want it say Rajput Became prominent in 12th and 13th century. U can thus add Prithviraj as Rajput king with these sources with practical explaination by u.Anyway user on wikipedia dont like anything against Their Agenda or Narrative.

If these sources help u i am grateful then. Bye ☺️☺️☺️☺️😊😊😊.2401:4900:40A8:53F:7F8B:752F:4F1C:9FE4 (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much sir Sungpeshwe9 (talk) 06:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Well sourced Content

Ur well sourced content has been removed again on Prithviraj Chauhan Page By Same User Chariotder. If u want to readd Please do with Consensus With talk team anyway Ur source too was a aceadmic one Its unlikely They Will add As it is not acc to their Natrative Anyway That Guy seriously has problem with Rajput related Articles.If u can Try to readd that source. Cheers. 2401:4900:40B7:99A6:2384:CAFF:2D6A:ABFA (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chariotrider is poorly sourced, and is spamming Jadeja article too. I was able to get him blocked once, since he was reverting my well referenced work. Please stick to good references and facts, and fight this unfounded hatred towards Hindus and Rajputs.--OnlyTruthShallPrevail (talk) 02:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brother report him he already has engaged in edit warring 4-5 times on rathore and rajput pages Sungpeshwe9 (talk) 04:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please drop all your references here i will revert his edits OnlyTruthShallPrevail (talk · contribs) Sungpeshwe9 (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi All,

This matter is very serious please take against such who are continuously writing contents against 1 community.

On jadeja page why would a muslim convert to Hinduism in that time and claim himself rajput.

Rana of Bharat tried and gave a lot of information but still there was no action taken.

You guys are can ask proper authority to block them and take down their page. Jbinsan (talk) 12:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Learn to Use Refrences Properly

Hello Ur Edits on Prithviraj Chauhan article has been removed because u dont know how To Cite Sources properly Kindly listen carefully, U Need to Tell the Caste haters especially likes of Chariotder Anyway U Need to say that Kaushik Roy state that Prithviraj Vijay present Us about Rajput Warriors and Chahaman Rajput Clan So How can Rajput idenity didnt exist If he quote from Prithviraj Vijay Tablot or Jackson cant be Finall authority on Prithviraj. Also Romila Thapar call Prithviraj vijay a Work of Rajput courts and it revolved around Rajput valour Anyway Also Work of Chattopadhaya says Rajput idenity became prominent in 12th and 13th century learn to Give page numbers of specific Book Not entire book on Section. Give page number learn to cite sources properly and Try to Edit Your Sources on Prithviraj Chauhan and Other Rajput Clan page but in Better manner with refrences and page number and Better explaination of what u want to convey.2401:4900:40A1:2BEC:9D9F:3DFE:65C7:6D63 (talk) 13:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also try to add Multiple source again which says Rajput originate in prominemce in 9th century or Something like These with Secondary sources and then challenge the versiomnand dont quote Raj era sources.2401:4900:40A1:2BEC:9D9F:3DFE:65C7:6D63 (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Like these Source of Satish Chandra Mention Gurjara Pratiharas As Rajput kingdom in 10th century on page 19 u can quote His sources on That Page Of Pratiharas instead of Brittanica But Firsts read Book and Learn to cite refrences In Systematical manner Please Learn Citing Source Tutorial on Wikipedia for more

Satish Chandra (2004). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206-1526) - Part One. Har-Anand Publications. ISBN 978-81-241-1064-5.

Here is Chandra book from Page 19 to 22 he states about Rajput Dynasties in Early medieval Period and didnt mention anchronism U can cite these if u wish on Rajput dynasties Page But read book first from Page number 19 and try to find more sources.2401:4900:40A1:2BEC:9D9F:3DFE:65C7:6D63 (talk) 13:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rana Sanga article

Hello Sungpeshwe9 I recently saw Your contribution to Rana Sanga u made some good contribution But u didnt add ref properly like name of Author year of book and in Bibliography section,Also u copy paste entire Battle part Please add brief details instead of So Much Stuff it need brief summary i Added Content Too Removing misinforamtion like his death Place he never return to Chittor after khanuwa defeat and died in Kalpi in Up as part of his oath. I add those datas and many more from reliable sources If someone revert those kindly u readd them but keep in minding adding about ref details with book section. Bye have a good time. 2401:4900:40B7:99A6:4310:259:3A55:D5C4 (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Alivardi (talk) 21:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:21, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Deval Rajputs

Hello, Sungpeshwe9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deval Rajputs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]