User talk:SunDawn/Archives/2021/December

This is an archive of past discussions about User:SunDawn. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

Administrator changes

A Train • Berean Hunter • Epbr123 • GermanJoe • Sanchom • Mysid

Technical news

Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)

Arbitration

Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

False information in Samta Party page

Dear sir, Someone continue editing false information in Samta Party page. False information about office bearers and remove the citation. http://samataparty.org/nation-office-bearers/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.207.69.189 (talk) 12:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello! I would take a look at it. Thank you! SunDawn talk 14:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

please refrain from deleting my tips

please refrain from deleting my tips — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joey ryan epic (talk • contribs) 16:57, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello Joey ryan epic! Hopefully you have a nice day. The edit you made about your tips is not conforming to the standards of Wikipedia, as Wikipedia is about encyclopaedia and not about a place to provide tips. Please see WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOT for more information. Thank you! SunDawn talk 17:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Ammendment

Maybe you could add it to the criticisms of him? He misdiagnosed me with lichen schlerosus which was very distressing. 31.52.154.8 (talk) 13:20, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello 31.52.154.8! Hopefully you have a great day. I am very sorry that you got misdiagnosed by Christopher Bunker but in Wikipedia we are not allowed to add contents that are unsourced. Personal experience are not permitted to be used as sources as that counted as original research per WP:NOR. Thank you. SunDawn talk 13:25, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Help with the Bibliography

Hi SunDawn,

Thank you for the advice on the male prostitution Wikipedia page I was trying to edit. I know how to add my sources to the reference list, but adding them to the bibliography and formatting them correctly has been a struggle. I was wondering if you could help me with that process. Totallytubularthesaurus (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello Totallytubularthesaurus! I think the problem has been resolved well! You are doing a great job. Is there anything you need help? I will gladly try to answer your questions. I will also remove my warning on your page as you clearly are doing it in good faith. Have a nice day! SunDawn talk 03:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I responded to all comments mentioned in the maintenance template. I wonder if you could kindly consider its removal. Ahmed S. Abdel-Moneim (talk) 21:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello! First of all, thank you for the barnstar. I have re-examined the article again. In my opinion, the maintenance template must still be in the article. Concerning the WP:NOTABILITY concern, from my reading the organization still failed WP:ORG, especially as there is no reliable sources that covers the organization in depth. Please see WP:CORPDEPTH.

I also note that you may have close connection with the subject, which may be true or not true, but seeing your edit histories I think you are too closely connected with the subject of the article. The sources that is used is mostly closely related to the organizations, such as papers or press releases by the organization, creating problems for verifiability. Please read WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:SPS.

If you have any questions, please do ask! Thank you and have a great day! SunDawn talk 21:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)