Jump to content

User talk:Suman shaikh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suman shaikh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Suman shaikh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


May 2020

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 15:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Suman shaikh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Requesting my block reviewed and lifted. This was my first article and I tried to follow the guidelines. I am new to this platform and not familiar with all of the guidelines but I read Wikipedia's covert advertising and Unambiguous advertising or promotion and understood why I was blocked. I assure you this will not happen again. Please look into this and grant me an opportunity to improve.Suman shaikh (talk) 17:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui  14:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Suman shaikh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Requesting someone to review my block. I have read Wikipedia guidelines including WP:PAID and WP:G11 and understood the reason I was blocked. This was my first article and I know that I have violated Wikipedia rules but I assure it will not happen again. Please review my unblock request and grant me a chance to improve. I will strive to follow Wikipedia policies about neutrality, COI. I will also disclose my connection with the subject my my talk page . Suman shaikh (talk) 14:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't convincing. Frankly, you aren't going to be unblocked to continue editing articles for which you have a conflict of interest. And you've pointed to a couple of policies but haven't convinced us you have read them, let alone understood them. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Littlstar

[edit]

Hi @MER-C:

I've noticed you have moved an article I created into draft space and blocked me from editing Wikipedia pages. I did not receive even a single warning from you prior to this block. This was my first article and I have tried to follow the guidelines. Could you please tell me what parts of the article are written like an advertisement so i could correct the article in a way you suggest.-Suman shaikh (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suman shaikh, You say you understand why you were blocked, can you explain why you think you were blocked? Also, if you've read the policy, you should know that if you are in any way associated with the company you need to disclose that fact, especially if you're being WP:PAID. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptainEek:, thanks for your response. I went back and checked the article and feel that the content needs to be rephrased in a more neutral point of view manner especially the introductory paragraph. I just read WP:PAID and would like to disclose here that I've a conflict of interest with Littlstar. I am employee of the company and I am not being directly paid to create this page. I don't intend to violate any rules and assure you that I will not repeat the same thing in the future. Requesting you to please unblock me so i could correct the article and remove promotional and problematic sentences.

@CaptainEek: I would really appreciate your suggestions on what i should do next to resolve this issue.

Your draft article, Draft:Littlstar

[edit]

Hello, Suman shaikh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Littlstar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]