User talk:Sumalfernando
Welcome!
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to a Sri Lanka related article, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.
As a contributor to Sri Lankan articles, you may like to connect with other Sri Lankan Wikipedians through WikiProject Sri Lanka, a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Sri Lanka, and take a look at the various activities we are engaged in.
If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or write {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. If you have a question related to a Sri Lankan article, you can view a list of members of WikiProject Sri Lanka by clicking here and ask any of us a question. We will always be glad to help.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Getting help:
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
- Good luck, and have fun. -- ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 02:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
[edit]Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page G.I. Joe worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Katerenka (talk) 07:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vise, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DoktorMandrake 23:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Workbench. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 23:53, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Workbench. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. *Pepperpiggle**Sign!* 23:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
[edit]This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Shaun Marsh. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. DoktorMandrake 00:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sumal 'BEAST" Fernando
[edit]A tag has been placed on Sumal 'BEAST" Fernando requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
The article The Dark Awakening has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable per Wikipedia:NBOOK, unreferenced, can find no trace online of book or author, possible WP:HOAX.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 23:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)