User talk:Sultanfaghal
September 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Khan Khel, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. KaySL (talk) 10:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pakhal Sarkar, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://chiefacoins.com/Database/Countries/Amb.htm.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
deletion of Khankhel
[edit]Why delete Khankhel page? It states that Khankhel is a very common sub ribe name in the KpK province Pakistan and also might be possibly in Afghanistan tribes. I agree that some edits are dubious and misleading; for example when I viewed it last, someone had added history heading and had just mentioned jadoons and somehow relating them to Kala Dhaka tribes. I removed that info. I believe deletion is not the solution. keep an eye on the page and try to fix it if possible. secondly the long list of notables with RED links also should be deleted or a separate page for each notable and then link to the page. cheersWikitanoli (talk) 15:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Pakhal Sarkar for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pakhal Sarkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakhal Sarkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SMS Talk 08:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)