User talk:Sukh/Revert War Evidence

I talked to JusticeLaw on his talk page, to encourage him to contribute something, and he attempted a merger of the two versions of the Urdu article instead of reverting. The merged version was very similar to his old preferred version where the two conflicted, but I think he showed good faith. Zora then made her version, which was much closer to the version she prefered, but I think also showed good faith. However, JusticeLaw took it in bad faith as a covert revert. I then made a compromise version (NPOV as far as I can tell except for any new POV's of my own that I added), and both sides seem to have accepted it except for a couple details.

I don't know the history of this, but it seems to be more of a case of assuming bad faith from the other and tit-for-tat blind reverts rather than actual bad faith. Zora believes that JusticeLaw is Harprit, who has been vandalizing her user page and who I just threatened to block. I don't know if JusticeLaw is the same person; the problem I have with him is that he won't participate on the Urdu talk page. And Zora won't talk to him, assuming that he's Harprit. kwami 08:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

I don't actually think it is a case of assuming bad faith. If you look at the history of the edits, you will notice that we have on several occasions tried to discuss issues and come to some sort of compromise - without result. Unfortunately, now I do assume bad faith automatically whenever this user or his sock puppets edit. But I am only human... Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk