User talk:Sugarpack

Draft of Lefelhocz

Hi, I moved your draft Sugarpack:/Draft of Lefelhocz to User:Sugarpack/Draft of Lefelhocz, where it belongs. Svick (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't know it was in the wrong place. What were the repercussions of it being Sugarpack:/Draft of Lefelhocz instead of User:Sugarpack/Draft of Lefelhocz? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sugarpack (talk • contribs) 17:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under the former name, the article was a normal Wikipedia article (with a strange name), and so all guidelines and policies would apply to it. Theoretically, it could have even been deleted (though I hope no admin would do that). If the article is in your userspace (its name begins with “User:Sugarpack/”), the rules are much more loose and it is also considered impolite for other editors to edit it. When you think the article is ready to be part of the encyclopedia, you can move it. In this case, I think to the name John Lefelhocz. Svick (talk) 17:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Studio Art Quilt Associates - SAQA

The article Studio Art Quilt Associates - SAQA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No showing of notability. Further, page does not even discuss the supposed topic. Confusing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 07:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]