User talk:Sueswim03

License tagging for Image:SEC exterior.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SEC exterior.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Barrington, Illinois -assessment and ref review

I saw your request for assessment and Ref tag support for Berrington, Illinois from within the ChicagoWikiProject article. I'll look over the Barrington article and see if I can help. If there is anything I need to pass onto you, I will post it below. If you need to respond to anything, please do so below, I'll have a watch on this section for awhile. Pknkly (talk) 17:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: picture at Barrington High School (Lake County, Illinois)

Hiya Sueswim03!

That picture you added to this article was great! Adding images like that are important improvements to school articles. I wanted to not only give you some praise for that, but to let you know that I moved the picture in the article. Wikipedia's manual of style for images advises editors against putting an image in an article in a location where it causes text to be pinched between two images, or between an image and an infobox. Taking a cure from other articles, I moved your picture into the infobox (usually you put the picture at the bottom of the infobox, which is where I have moved it. Rather than move and not say anything, I wanted to drop a note and advise you as to what I did, and why I did it. Best of luck on your editing! LonelyBeacon (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Hotel Colorado 2007.jpg

File:Hotel Colorado 2007.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Hotel Colorado 2007.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Hotel Colorado 2007.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:S_H_Greenstamps_Santa_Cruz_Market_Santa_Barbara_CA.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:S_H_Greenstamps_Santa_Cruz_Market_Santa_Barbara_CA.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:05, 29 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Darkwind (talk) 12:05, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sueswim03. You have new messages at Airplaneman's talk page.
Message added 22:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DYK for Herman Hollis

On 13 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Herman Hollis, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that FBI special agent Herman Hollis (pictured) was involved in the Bureau's shootouts with John Dillinger, Baby Face Nelson and possibly Pretty Boy Floyd? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Herman Hollis.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks from the active members of the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 16:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barrington, IL

Sueswim, I noticed you removed the mention of the Barrington photographer from the Barrington, IL wiki article. You mentioned you weren't sure why it was noteworthy. Please reach out to me so we can discuss at 2009@perhelionsystems.com

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.9.253.93 (talk) 18:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Sorry, 173.9.253.93 (talk), I do not contact users outside of Wikipedia. It is unclear why this photographer is notable. Please refer to Wikipedia:Notability_(people) for guidance, including the basic criteria section. Sueswim03 (talk) 22:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Appreciate your efforts with Bommer Canyon. Keep up the good work! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Bommer Canyon

Hello! Your submission of Bommer Canyon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 09:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bommer Canyon

On 20 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bommer Canyon, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 2008, nearly 40,000 acres of the former Irvine Ranch, including Bommer Canyon, were designated as the first California Natural Landmark? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bommer Canyon.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adrienne Maloof-Nassif, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irish, Lebanese and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Chapel Exterior.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:18, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Chapel Interior.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Three for Breakfast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James MacDonald. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sueswim03. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sueswim03. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Film history for Geoffrey Baer page is much larger than your small chart.

The 38 shows currently available on PBS are at https://interactive.wttw.com/geoffrey-baer-tours (Sorry I don't know how to revise the chart myself.)

Image source problem with File:Wrangell Sign.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wrangell Sign.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Santa Barbara Courthouse Plaque.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Santa Barbara Courthouse Plaque.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]