User talk:Suefrost2019

Hi Suefrost2019! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

18:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sue Frost (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft has a number of issues. The subject may not meet WP:NPOLITICIAN, and large part of the draft are sourced only with WP:PRIMARY sources. The subject's successful-yet-seemingly non-notable business career also seems to fail to establish the subject's general notability. Finally (and perhaps most importantly), the creator's name implies this draft was created contrary to WP:COI and WP:NOT; indeed, parts of the draft read like paid PR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sue Frost and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sue Frost, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sue Frost has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sue Frost. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 05:37, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sue Frost (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sue Frost and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sue Frost, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 05:37, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Username concern

Hello Suefrost2019. I see that you have declared a conflict of interest regarding your draft article. Given that your username and the name of the person in your draft is the same, I have some points to raise:

If you are Sue Frost herself, you should not be writing about yourself, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. We discourage people from writing about themselves because of the inherent difficulty in writing about yourself from the required netural point of view, and using only information from reliable independent sources and no original reseach.
If you are not Sue Frost, then your account name should not use her name. Wikipedia routinely blocks accounts that use the names of real, well-known persons to prevent damaging impersonation.

Furthermore if you are paid to represent her interests, then you must make a mandatory paid editing disclosure, as a standard conflict of interest declaration is not enough. Wikipedia's paid editing policy and terms of use require anyone who is receiving compensation for their work on Wikipedia to list what articles they were paid to edit, and who is paying them. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Your account has been mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suefrost2019. You are invited to participate in the discussion.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suefrost2019, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- RoySmith (talk) 01:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]