User talk:Sudhirkbhargava

Hello Sudhirbhargava, I appreciate your good efforts of expanding the page Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya, but the citations which you have mentioned are from books which appear to have a glorifying and biased tone. This tone is fine for a biography but is unencyclopaedic and unsuitable for Wikipedia. Please read Neutral point of view/FAQ and also the Talk page of Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya for contesting my POV arguments. Edits should be made only when a neutral point is agreed upon. I also made some grammar and punctuation corrections, I guess you should be ok with those. Please keep up the good work of adding useful info, but please also try to maintain Wiki standards. Salilb (talk) 03:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrongful deletion of content in Manusmrti

Dear user, you have deleted an entire section in the article with the comment "Wrong interpretations and without reference." Please note that the section that you deleted were essentially quotes from the Manusmriti itself. A link to Manusmriti in Sanskrit, accompanied by English translation, was attached as reference to each of the quotes contained in the section. You are requested to clarify what you mean by "Wrong interpretations and without reference." Next time you delete entire sections, you are requested to please note your reasons for doing so in detail in the Talk page. Sreejiraj (talk) 04:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hem Chander Vikramaditya

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hem Chander Vikramaditya. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hem Chander Vikramaditya. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for Delhi

Can you copyedit the WP:LEAD section of the article Battle for Delhi please? If you have any question or comments, please leave me a message in my talk page! Thanks for your contribution! --Tito Dutta ✉ 05:13, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied in my talk page! --Tito Dutta ✉ 07:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied in my talk page! --Tito Dutta ✉ 08:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add WP:LEAD --Tito Dutta ✉ 06:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New message

You have a new message in my talk page! --Tito Dutta ✉ 10:40, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's up?

Long time. No chat! What's up? How are you doing? --Tito Dutta ✉ 17:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. When you recently edited Bhargava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hissar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Brahmavarta

Do you mean this http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/77176/Brahmavarta? Have you checked if we have an article already! --Tito Dutta ✉ 14:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC) There is no page on 'Brahmavarta' on Wiki. Also there is no information available even on Britannica. I was trying to create a page, but could not. Please advise how to go about it.Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 14:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why you could not create the page? Error message? --Tito Dutta ✉ 14:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the past I created couple of pages, like Dhosi Hill, Battle for Delhi. The pages opened easily. I do not know why I am not able to open 'Brahmavarta'. Please advise how to go about it.Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 15:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Purana Qila, Delhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manusmṛti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Manusmṛti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Environment, Advisory, Himalayan, Ordinance, Persian, Devas, Chambal and St. Peter's Cathedral

Dhosi Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Manu, Crater, Ordinance and Rejuvenation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chyawanprash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Devas

Drsadvati River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kuru

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dab links

Unless you find exact article link, you can unlink those! Best, Tito Dutta ✉ 04:42, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jodhpur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vedic period

Hi Sudhir, I've reverted your edits to the article on Vedic period. Please don't add mythological dates and content to historical articles. Almost all historical sources agree that India was in Stone Age before 7th millenium BCE, whereas, Rig Veda is a text of the Chalcolithic Age. Adding "10,000 years ago" and "great floods" as the origin of Vedic period not only contradicts scholarly opinion, it makes Wikipedia look silly. I see you've interacted with Tito before. If need a second opinion on this, you can always ask him. Regards. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 02:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Sudhirkbhargava. You have new messages at CorrectKnowledge's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bhrigu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ayurveda

Thanks for your note. And for your efforts to fix the issues and add sources. I hope you will read the policy that I pointed to. Let's continue discussion of your proposed addition on the Ayurveda Talk page. TimidGuy (talk) 10:56, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Vivekananda

Thank you for participating Sudhir Ji. Keep an eye on User talk:Titodutta#Swami Vivekananda FAR. When we take the article to Feature Article Review, I will inform you. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 16:28, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Brands

Hello, Sudhirkbhargava. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining WikiProject Brands! Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:22, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013

File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg		Have an enjoyable New Year!
		Hello Sudhirkbhargava: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Happy New Year! -- Tito Dutta (talk) 15:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion issues

Could you reply at at the deletion discussion as to how you obtained the image of Lord Rama. If the image is photographed from an existing art work, it would make the image a derivative work and the copyright would become harder to establish. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 10:15, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP Brands – Lists compiled for project banner tagging using AnomieBOT

A discussion is occurring at the talk page for WikiProject Brands at Proceeding with automatic project banner tagging using AnomieBOT regarding moving forward with automatic talk page tagging with the project's banner using AnomieBOT. All members of this project will be notified with neutrally-worded notifications about this discussion, and please feel free to contribute to it. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ayurveda

Just to be clear, in our discussion at WP:RSN I didn't mean Kulbhushan Mishra was irrelevant. What I meant was that his paper Dancing Elements of Indian Rock Painting with Special Reference to Chhattisgarh in Journal of the Directorate of Culture & Archaeology was irrelevant to our discussion on Ayurveda since the paper is about Rock paintings. It however would be a reliable source for any discussion related to rock art. I'll refrain from commenting further at RSN. Let me make way for other uninvolved editors who are experienced at dealing with issues of reliability of sources. Regards. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 12:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions pertain to dating of Rigveda, Vedic Period as well as Ayurveda or Chyavanprash, which I claimed to be 10,000 years old on wiki pages, and have been claiming in different seminars on Saraswati or Vedic state of Brahmavarta. I-SERVE also ratifies that Vedic Period and Saraswati culture existed 10,000 years ago. Study by Mr. Misra analyses paintings which are older than 10,000 years. So they become important in dating of Indian Culture and other information.Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 12:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he connects paintings to dating of Rig Veda in his I–SERVE presentation, but he doesn't appear to make that connection in an earlier paper on Indian Rock Painting in Chhatisgarh. That is why I called that paper irrelevant (for our purposes) but reliable. His I-SERVE paper is relevant but unreliable. That's my take, will wait for other editors. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 12:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Talk Page of Ayurveda

I could not understand which section you were talking about, I have posted a reply. Let me know if it was not the correct one! --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note

It looks like the discussion at RSN has taken an interesting turn since you posted on my Talk page. I'm afraid there's not much support for using the conference proceedings as sources. Peer-reviewed publications are the best sources. TimidGuy (talk) 11:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manusmṛti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hemu article problems

It seems that there has been a lot of slow edit-warring going on at Hemu, in which you have played a part. I have reverted the article to its state prior to that and I ask that you discuss the seemingly controversial aspects of it at Talk:Hemu. Batting the same content ball back and forth without any meaningful discussion is never going to achieve anything. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Purana Qila

Hi, thanks for improving the article. Is it indeed a fact that there was a fort at the site prior to the time of Humayun/Sher Shah Suri? Not challengoing your edit, just curious. Please tell me anything more that you know when you get the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.14.31.76 (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hemu's caste

A lot of thanks Sudhir ji for highlighting the character and life of Hemu, unsung hero of Indian history, on Wikipedia. As far as Hemu's caste is concerned, Brahmins and Vaishyas, both claim him their ancestor. When it comes to the fact, that Hemu was Vaishya, you can visit Wikipedia article "Gumnaam Vikramaditya", in which the writer of this book has cited several references to prove him Vaishya. Though, I know, you are trying to prove Hemu Brahmin and there may also be some references. It, after all, enhances the glory of Hemu. Mohangarg21 (talk) 04:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sahibi River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harappan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haryana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hemu

If you keep changing his caste in the article in defiance of consensus then you will find yourself blocked for edit warring. Please continue discussion on the talk page, as you were doing at one point. - Sitush (talk) 08:55, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brahmavarta concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brahmavarta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am finding it difficult to manage and retain in good form some more important pages, like HEMU, BHARGAVA, REWARI etc. which I created and contributed sufficiently. So no fun in creating another page which will be spoiled by editors later on. BRAHMAVARTA, was an important state in India 10,000 years ago, which was the place for launching Vedic Sanskriti and Sanatan Dharm as per Sanskrit Granths.Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 03:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hemu And His Times

Do you have a copy of this book by ML Bhargava that you have referenced on Talk:Hemu? As you say, it seems to contain detailed discussion (about various theories?) of Hemu's origins and early life in the first chapter, and I would be interested in reading that if possible. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 15:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do have a copy. Can scan first 18 relevent pages, which pertain to heredity, parentage, caste, etc. Send me email id. regards.Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great!

To avoid spam, I won't print out my email ID here, but you can email me through wikipedia, (click here); that form may not allow attachments but I can reply to you with my email). Of course, we should keep our general discussion about the article on wiki where other editors can weigh in. Abecedare (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for emailing me the scanned pages. I'll go through them and the other sources, and add my thoughts to Talk:Hemu later this week. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 15:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shell wait for your thoughts.Regards.Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 15:59, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhir, can you let us know if Nilotpalbera1990 (talk · contribs) is your account, or of someone you know? If so, could you revert the recent changes made by that account on Hemu pending the discussion on the talkpage, since such use of multiple accounts is frowned upon on wikipedia. (aside: I have read the ML Bhargava abstract and intend to post my views by Saturday once I have had the chance to look up a couple of other sources) Thanks. Abecedare (talk) 15:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neither it is my account nor I know the person. Please do not expect such irresponsible acts from me. This page I am caring and protecting since 2008 and waiting for concensus on certain issues.Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 15:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhir, I have asked the Checkuser to run a check (you are welcome to comment there). I am sincerely hoping that you are not involved, in which case the CU should be able to confirm that, and we can proceed with the discussion after perhaps getting the Hemu page semi-protected to prevent further disruption from anon-editors and newly created accounts. Abecedare (talk) 20:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I am now convinced that Nilotpalbera1990 is not you and have said is in an update on the checkuser page. Hope this didn't cause you much aggravation. Abecedare (talk) 00:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ten days have gone. I am still waiting for discussions to go further. Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 04:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, got distracted by other on- and off-wiki activities, and the Hemu page slipped off my radar. Will poist my thought on Talk:Hemu by this weekend. Abecedare (talk) 14:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shall wait, Thanks.Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 16:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping on my talk page. The fact is that while I have read several sources on the subject by now, there are some standard works that I would like to see before forming a firm opinion. That's the reason for the delay. However, you are right that I shouldn't leave others hanging in the discussion, especially since I may be able to get hold of those reference works only by December. So I'll summarize what I have seen so far, and my tentative conclusions/suggestions this weekend on the Hemu talk page. I appreciate your and Sitush's patience! Abecedare (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its Okay.Sudhirkbhargava (talk) 03:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After a long delay, I have at last posted my analysis of the sources and proposed text for the early life section on the Hemu Talk page. Comments are welcome. Thanks for your patience during this process; hope we can continue working in such collaborative and accommodating fashion. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brahmavarta concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brahmavarta, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you

I will improve if you will askRajsector3 (talk) 11:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brahmavarta concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brahmavarta, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brahmavarta has been accepted

Brahmavarta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:35, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]