User talk:Sudhakar naidu 118

This is Sudhakar naidu 118's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello Sudhakar naidu 118! Welcome to Wikipedia! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. If you're already loving Wikipedia and plan on becoming a Wikipedian you might consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor, just paste {{Adoptme}} into your userpage. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You might also consider joining a WikiProject so as to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 223.182.186.187 (talk)

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost, our newspaper • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

PDF Guides

Guide to wikimarkup
How to use images
Avoiding plagiarism
How to cite sources (1)
How to cite sources (2)
Choosing the right Wikipedia article to edit

Video Guides

How to start a Sandbox article on Wikipedia
How to use bold and links
How to use a watchlist
How to use talk pages
Citing sources (1)
Citing sources (2)
How to create a Wikipedia article
How to improve a Wikipedia article

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zinga (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See the guidelines on future films, which are seldom notable unless production has been notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zinga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zinga, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sudhakar naidu 118! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zinga (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zinga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zinga, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:28, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zinga (2019 film) (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough sourcing to show this is a notable film.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zinga (2019 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zinga (2019 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:21, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Zinga (2019 film)

Draft:Zinga (2019 film), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zinga (2019 film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Zinga (2019 film) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zinga (2019 film) (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:

Declined, until discussion at MfD is finished. I did not review the page, this is purely a technical decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zinga (2019 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zinga (2019 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 22:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zinga (film 2019) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zinga (film 2019) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zinga (film 2019) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 20:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zinga (film 2019). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hi Praxidicae how can i tag Wikipedia:Speedy keep please help me i don't know why you are trying to delete my article, iam new to Wikipedia please help me.Sudhakar naidu 118 (talk) 21:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 13:51, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for suggestion. i am just in learning stage' i don't know some rules but i respect Wikipedia.Sudhakar naidu 118 (talk) 14:12, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhakar naidu 118 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not a sock puppet for any one please cheek my ip address and edits. User:Praxidicae this user personally targeted me. looking for justice Sudhakar naidu 118 (talk) 18:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing attacks on other Wikipedia editors will not be considered. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I didn't personally target you, so you should probably remove that from your request. Praxidicae (talk)

User:Praxidicae stop targeting me i have a evidence for that you're wantedly trying to blaming me someones sock puppetry with out strong reason,evidence that means personal attackWikipedia:PA you just miss using your administrator rights. i will be back because i am not sock puppetry for any one.Sudhakar naidu 118 (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sudhakar naidu 118 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25405 was submitted on May 29, 2019 18:52:49. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:52, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you insist on attacking other editors, your talk page access will be revoked. If you have an issue, state it, but do it without insulting other editors or implying they have been up to no good. Primefac (talk) 13:24, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Primefac i do not insulted any one i just sharing the truth to show other users and administrators like you. i was blocked with out a strong reason. i am not a sock puppet for any one. can you please tell me how can i request a CheckUser about this issue. you can cheek my ip address and edits. you will know the truth. and this is not good to warn me i am all redye blocked user who looking for help. i thought Wikipedia is great open community organization. but Here everything is reveres to my thoughts. if you want block my talk page please do it nothing will happen i will save my time to put some other work. Sudhakar naidu 118 (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

requesting to cheek user

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sudhakar naidu 118 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The message below seems to be an unblock request; converted from {{help me}} ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia has been spammed with Chigurala-related content for years. While you may not be the same person(s) as the past spammers, I don't believe that your attempts are unrelated. See WP:MEAT and WP:COWORKER. Huon (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

hi User:DoRD, User:NinjaRobotPirate, User:Stwalkerster, i was blocked in the case of sock puppet with out a strong strong reason. can you please cheek my ip address and edits. i bevel that i am not a sock puppet for any one. i want continue my contributions to Wikipedia.Sudhakar naidu 118 (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gowtham Tinnanuri

Hello, Sudhakar naidu 118. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gowtham Tinnanuri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]