User talk:Success20

Welcome!

Hello, Success20, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Baby Triggy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Momo san ^Gespräch 20:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Baby Triggy

A tag has been placed on Baby Triggy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Momo san ^Gespräch 20:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Baby Triggy, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Momo san ^Gespräch 21:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Baby Triggy, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:35, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{hangon}}

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure why you're still removing all the wikilinks from Curtis Michael Anderson. However, since you've never made an appropriate edit to Wikipedia, I've blocked you until after the conclusion of the deletion discussion on that article. If, when your block expires, you'd like to volunteer to help write Wikipedia, we'd be happy to have your help. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Success20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock. I don't understand what I'm supposed to edit. Everything I wrote about Baby Triggy is verifiable information.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for disruptive editing; specifically, for repeatedly removing wikilinks from Curtis Michael Anderson. you are not blocked for anything you did to the Baby Triggy article. Please use your block time to learn the fundamentals of editing and of policy here. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 17:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you don't understand the rule you broke, you won't be able to prevent yourself from breaking it again, and an unblock won't be possible. You'll need to make sure that your request includes clear evidence that you understand WP:N and WP:COI. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Success20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm requesting for an unblock. I have read and understand the rules.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 11:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-admin comment Then tell us what they are. You aren't being very specific here.--Iner22 (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Success20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm requesting for an unblock. I’m very sorry. I have read and understand the rules. I understand what I have been blocked for. It will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Please forgive me Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Come back once your block expires (which is already half way up). Tiptoety ^talk 07:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you wish to be unblocked, you need to convince us that you understand the rules and why you were blocked. What rules did you violate? What about your edits were damaging and disruptive? What would a useful contribution to Wikipedia be? What specific things will you do differently from what you already have if you are unblocked? --Jayron32 05:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can see, you're only blocked for a week. I recomend you serve the time, think about what you did and why it was wrong, and consider how you will act once your block expires. That will be your second chance. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]